Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution
Date	2017-04-22 15:46 -0700
Message-ID	<D5212B71.A0D93%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(18 earlier) <op.yyraw8wjjs98qf@red.lan> <150420171910098691%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy3x1tpojs98qf@red.lan> <D52109A1.A0D0F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <220420171833026230%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/22/17, 3:33 PM, in article 220420171833026230%nospam@nospam.invalid,
"nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <D52109A1.A0D0F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit
> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> Which ones would you suggest. I used to use Epson and they had higher
>> quality but died far faster. Ended up buying a bunch for a school and half
>> were dead by the end of the year (they did get high usage). Went the next
>> year with HP and had one die and the rest lasted for several years.
> 
> if you print photos, epson.
> for laser printers, brother is inexpensive.
> for text and various paper types, hp.

That is what I found years ago when I went with HP... but have done little
research since. 

I print few photos... but also rarely use anything other than standard
paper. Most of my printing is for homeschooling my kids and printing recipes
or game ideas or the like.

>> This was nearly a decade ago so things might have changed.
> 
> they did.

Fair enough.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 18:40 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-22 14:10 -0500
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 20:23 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 13:22 -0700
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 21:34 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:23 -0700
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-22 18:33 -0400
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:46 -0700
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-22 18:33 -0400

csiph-web