Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #293
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.msdos.programmer, comp.os.msdos.misc, alt.msdos |
| Subject | Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? |
| Date | Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:46:17 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 32 |
| Message-ID | <4E9CBE49.C89ADE01@Guy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4E9B5A53.392C9558@Guy.com> <j7hm5v$2rt$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | amG2Qc8bYw6HXjTdnxZBRg.user.speranza.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) |
| X-Accept-Language | en |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.msdos.programmer:293 comp.os.msdos.misc:148 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Ross Ridge wrote: > Since MS-DOS acts as as device driver of last resort for the VMM, > you could also argue that Windows 95 is running on top of MS-DOS. Isin't it more accurate to say that Windows 9x is simply accessing hardware via a 16-bit driver running in the DOS VMM that IT (windows) controls? And is this only for situations where there is no 32-bit driver installed? Perhaps in the early days of Win-9x there were many systems that were upgraded and perhaps some new off-the-shelf systems that had to rely on pre-existing 16-bit DOS or win-3.0 drivers, but a year or two later (and persisting until about 2005 or 2006) I'd venture a guess and say that there simply wasn't any hardware in use on the typical win-98 machine that didn't have 32-bit drivers. So for any win-98 system that *doesn't* have 16-bit device drivers, you can't really say that windows is running "on top of" DOS now can you? I guess my main point is that if you order various components horizontally such that there is a "top" component or top layer, you are implying that the layer underneath is a foundation for or is in control of the layer above it, and this lower layer must know that the higher layer exists. That clearly is not the case for the relationship between DOS and Win-9x. Wouldn't you agree that what we have here is a case where DOS runs "on top of" Windows 9x - and not the other way around? And even then - only when it's called for?
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-16 18:27 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Trifle Menot <triflemenot@beewyz.com> - 2011-10-16 23:38 +0000
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-17 05:16 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-17 16:47 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? tomdzip <tomdzip@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-17 09:02 -0700
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 08:42 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-17 13:34 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 16:43 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 18:34 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 19:29 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 20:36 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 21:36 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-18 09:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-18 10:51 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-18 13:49 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 12:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 19:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Trifle Menot <triflemenot@beewyz.com> - 2011-10-18 00:14 +0000
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 20:56 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 08:53 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-18 09:12 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2011-10-18 07:03 -0700
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-19 10:07 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Ant" <not@home.today> - 2011-10-19 01:26 +0100
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-19 09:19 +0200
csiph-web