Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #300
| From | DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.msdos.programmer, comp.os.msdos.misc, alt.msdos |
| Subject | Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? |
| Date | 2011-10-18 09:12 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <4E9D7B33.D82B93C3@Guy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4E9B5A53.392C9558@Guy.com> <j7hm5v$2rt$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> <4E9CBE49.C89ADE01@Guy.com> <9g4m4qFfqcU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Klaus Meinhard wrote: > > Isin't it more accurate to say that Windows 9x is simply accessing > > hardware via a 16-bit driver running in the DOS VMM that IT > > (windows) controls? > > Since DOS has to be started to provide a platform from which > Win95/98 can be launched, and has to be present so that Win95/98 > can run, it is perfectly defendable to say that Win 95/98 runs > "on top of" Windows. No. It's more like Win-9x is boot-loaded by DOS. I could just as easily say that Windows NT "runs on top of" it's boot loader. That is equally true according to your definition of "runs on top of" - but it's not a useful statement. The DOS that existed transiently in memory when win-9x was invoked is swept away as 9x is started. As such, Win-9x can't "run on top of" something that no longer exists. > Now you can carefully define your directions: perhaps Win95/98 runs > beside or under DOS? You can try to define the amount of DOS as a > percentage in any given situation. You can ask youself if a clone of > the underlying DOS is still DOS at all: has it its soul? Are you trying to imply that DOS is acting like an always-present foundation for Win-9x? If so, you might want to explain how 16-bit, single-tasking real-mode code can act as a foundation layer for a 32-bit, preemtive multi-tasking protected-mode OS running "above" it. Win-9x needs to be able to run 16-bit "DOS" programs. That was part of it's design mandate when it was created by Microsoft to insure backwards compatibility with the existing i86 software. So just because it does have full DOS-emulation capability inside it doesn't mean it needs to resort to any of it when it's running win32 code.
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-16 18:27 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Trifle Menot <triflemenot@beewyz.com> - 2011-10-16 23:38 +0000
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-17 05:16 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-17 16:47 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? tomdzip <tomdzip@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-17 09:02 -0700
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 08:42 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-17 13:34 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 16:43 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 18:34 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 19:29 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 20:36 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 21:36 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-18 09:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-18 10:51 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-18 13:49 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 12:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 19:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Trifle Menot <triflemenot@beewyz.com> - 2011-10-18 00:14 +0000
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 20:56 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 08:53 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-18 09:12 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2011-10-18 07:03 -0700
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-19 10:07 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Ant" <not@home.today> - 2011-10-19 01:26 +0100
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-19 09:19 +0200
csiph-web