Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #290
| From | DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.msdos, comp.os.msdos.programmer, comp.os.msdos.misc |
| Subject | Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? |
| Date | 2011-10-17 16:43 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <4E9C936D.AB209FED@Guy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4E9B5A53.392C9558@Guy.com> <j7grp5$ejv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <9g2tfsFj91U1@mid.individual.net> <j7houb$ut5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Rod Pemberton wrote: > It has PM 32-bit harddisk drivers. In fact, it has PM 32-bit > device drivers for just about everything. SATA drivers are the > only thing you won't find. That's actually incorrect. For the first-generation SATA controllers (circa 2003 to 2005) you'll have no problems finding win-98 drivers. This is true regardless if the controller is built on the motherboard or add-on PCI card. The last intel chipset to have win-9x support (ICH-5R I believe - the one that came with the 875 north bridge) had win-98 SATA/Raid driver support. As did many SiL 31xx-35xx chips. I currently have a pair of SATA 1.5 TB FAT-32 drives connected to one of my win-98 systems using a SiL 3112 dual-port PCI controller card. Win-98 sees this as a SCSI adapter in the device manager. The nice thing about having SATA drivers for win-98 (and setting the SATA ports to SATA/Raid in the bios - NOT IDE emulation mode) is that you don't have the 137 gb partition-size problem. I think the rule of thumb is that there are win-98 drivers for any/all SATA-1 controllers. But not for SATA-2/3 controllers. > EVGA Nvidia 7960GT 512MB I was under the impression that 512 mb on a video card was totally incompatible with windows 98. Perhaps that was only if the card was PCIe. Is your card AGP? > Memory is capped at 1GB for WinSE by HIMEMX, but full 4GB should > be available in MS-DOS. I've not confirmed though. I believe that DOS can see all 4 gb. You're right that himemX must be used to prevent Win-9x from "seeing" more than 1.5 gb of system ram (I believe that if you have 1.5 gb or less of actual ram, then you don't need to use himemX). I've played around with various vcache settings and have gotten win-98 to see and make use of 1.2 gb ram on a 2 gb system. Windows ME can see and make use of almost 2 gb (this ability apparently can't be transplanted into win-98). > With KernelEx, you can run all sorts of non-Win98/SE software Yes, I've been running KeX for about 3 years now.
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-16 18:27 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Trifle Menot <triflemenot@beewyz.com> - 2011-10-16 23:38 +0000
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-17 05:16 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-17 16:47 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? tomdzip <tomdzip@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-17 09:02 -0700
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 08:42 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-17 13:34 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 16:43 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 18:34 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 19:29 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 20:36 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 21:36 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-18 09:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-10-18 10:51 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-18 13:49 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 12:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-17 19:46 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Trifle Menot <triflemenot@beewyz.com> - 2011-10-18 00:14 +0000
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-10-17 20:56 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-18 08:53 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? DOS Guy <DOS@Guy.com> - 2011-10-18 09:12 -0400
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2011-10-18 07:03 -0700
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-19 10:07 +0200
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Ant" <not@home.today> - 2011-10-19 01:26 +0100
Re: What role does "DOS" play in Windows 95/98? "Klaus Meinhard" <K_Meinhard@gmx.de> - 2011-10-19 09:19 +0200
csiph-web