Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.setup > #4837
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.setup |
| Subject | Re: Linux on a small memory PC |
| Date | Fri, 08 Jul 2022 15:54:23 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 26 |
| Message-ID | <871quvs7m8.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> (permalink) |
| References | <ta6c1l$bneq$1@dont-email.me> <20220707124733.15776512@ryz> <87sfndt1p2.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <ta6vgd$dsj6$1@dont-email.me> <wbydnTl0uvtYk1r_nZ2dnUU7-NnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <87zghksqmi.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <ta8r0u$m5cq$1@dont-email.me> <87a69jscpa.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <ta9tdl$phse$7@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d0a95c95d2b115ece51b6be58bdd6ca9"; logging-data="851718"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MNFtkkWGvoZCpOYR3kCNa" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:u42nLel7Txw3oh61NhvsuSXpdfY= sha1:f4KBvONxku9lPnmWDvEel/E7I+k= |
| X-No-Archive | Yes |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:34996 comp.os.linux.setup:4837 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 19:35:33 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > > On 08/07/2022 19:04, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: >> On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:48:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>> But seriously, who expects and old 32 bit netbook to be in any kind of >>> serious use in 2038? >> Who expected any old computer from the 60s or 70s still in service >> on >> January 1st 2000? > > They weren't. Just some legacy COBOL code was all. There was a lot. Starting with MS-DOS before 5.0. which weren't not Y2K-compliant. In 2003 I bought an already old Pentium I (1996-ish). The BIOS would not allow to set 2003 as year and went back to 19-something (probably 1903, but I forgot). Subsequently a fairly new Linux did the same. I seem to remember that I told Linux in a start-script to add 100 years to the date. I was at that time in a cheap hotel, and WIFI wasn't around there, so no NTP to access which would have taken care of it. There is more. I think early Apple ][ failed Y2K too. -- Andreas
Back to comp.os.linux.setup | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 11:20 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2022-07-07 12:47 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 12:00 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-07 10:52 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 16:52 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-07-07 11:50 -0500
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-07 14:51 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 22:07 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 09:50 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 10:12 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 09:48 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-08 14:04 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 19:35 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-08 15:54 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2022-07-08 10:27 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-18 23:59 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-07-07 13:49 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 14:00 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-07 11:12 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-07-08 09:15 +1000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 09:56 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-07-09 09:41 +1000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-09 01:30 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-07-09 09:09 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-09 11:42 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 10:00 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-09 11:54 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 17:12 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-10 00:41 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-10 10:58 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-07-08 01:50 +0000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-07 21:57 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-07-08 09:50 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2022-07-08 14:18 +0000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-07-08 23:05 +0000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-07 21:15 -0400
csiph-web