Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.setup > #4815
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.setup |
| Subject | Re: Linux on a small memory PC |
| Date | 2022-07-07 12:00 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <ta6ed6$c0he$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ta6c1l$bneq$1@dont-email.me> <20220707124733.15776512@ryz> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 07/07/2022 11:47, Marco Moock wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 07. Juli 2022, um 11:20:36 Uhr schrieb The Natural > Philosopher: > >> So, if you have a machine of that class or better, Mint Mate at least >> will work pretty well. > > If it doesn't support i386 anymore, don't use it, it is then insecure. I don't think the application that this is intended for has any issues with that. Support for 19.2 runs until 2023. Really, you are not running nuclear power stations on a 16 (?) year old netbook Its for standalone word processing mainly. will never see the internet probably > First check if the CPU supports amd64 (Intel calls that EM64T/Intel-64). > If so, almost any distribution will work. Really, grandmothers and eggs, " i686 detected this distribution will not boot unless X-64 is detected) or something" > The Atom with 1.6 GHz is likely the N270, no amd64 support. If you bothered to look at the spec of the actual machine whose type number I quoted, you will see that this is exactly what is installed. No 'likely' about it > > I use Debian 11 on such machines, if you like you might you a much more > lightweight window manager like mwm instead of Mate. > Debian with mwm can run on a Pentium 3 600 MHz with 384 MiB RAM. > I installed Mint MATE because I can support it, the 32 bit is still supported, and it was to hand. And as far as I am concerned (I still run windows XP in a VM for specialist apps) obsolete code that worked in its day will still work if your usage doesn't change. And not to reiterate the thread we just fished with the light weight of the WM is completely irrelevant. When any browser or serious app will take ten times the RAM -- The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx
Back to comp.os.linux.setup | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 11:20 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2022-07-07 12:47 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 12:00 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-07 10:52 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 16:52 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-07-07 11:50 -0500
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-07 14:51 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 22:07 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 09:50 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 10:12 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 09:48 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-08 14:04 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 19:35 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-08 15:54 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2022-07-08 10:27 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-18 23:59 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-07-07 13:49 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-07 14:00 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-07 11:12 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-07-08 09:15 +1000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 09:56 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-07-09 09:41 +1000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-09 01:30 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-07-09 09:09 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-09 11:42 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 10:00 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-09 11:54 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 17:12 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-10 00:41 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-10 10:58 +0100
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-07-08 01:50 +0000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-07 21:57 -0400
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-07-08 09:50 +0200
Re: Linux on a small memory PC doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2022-07-08 14:18 +0000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2022-07-08 23:05 +0000
Re: Linux on a small memory PC "25B.Z959" <25B.Z959@nada.net> - 2022-07-07 21:15 -0400
csiph-web