Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #61808 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 22 participants
Thread has 1096 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1096 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-12-11 17:13 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? BlueManedHawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 15:15 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 21:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 04:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 02:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 13:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:13 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 00:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 01:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 14:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:20 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 17:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-10 11:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 20:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 13:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-17 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-11 03:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 01:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-11 04:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-11 13:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-12 04:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 08:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-17 04:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-18 00:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:46 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 15:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 08:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2024-12-13 09:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:49 -0500
Joy of Hydrogen (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:37 +0000
Joy of Nuclear Power (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 15:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:42 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-14 07:51 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-14 11:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 10:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 16:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 16:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-12 21:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 19:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 15:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:09 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-20 21:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 11:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 02:27 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 00:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-26 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 00:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 22:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 05:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 16:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 06:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-01 05:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 04:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:38 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:55 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 07:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-15 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-19 04:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 00:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 21:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 04:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:45 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:27 +0000
The Joy of Tax Havens Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of Tax Havens D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:04 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:32 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:25 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:01 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-01 12:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 06:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 03:22 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:43 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:12 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 16:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 01:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 00:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:35 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 01:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-26 03:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 23:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 03:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:06 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 00:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-01 03:23 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:36 +0000
The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 02:02 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:24 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:34 +0100
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 23:41 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 12:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 17:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 22:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 03:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:28 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:39 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:50 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 22:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:29 -0700
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 21:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 00:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:21 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:59 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 02:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 22:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:30 +0100
Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-10 11:47 +0000
Re: Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 01:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 03:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:29 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-13 23:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 23:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 18:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:44 +0100
The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-14 21:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:05 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:02 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:10 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:44 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 04:07 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:49 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:28 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:41 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:05 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 07:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:02 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:07 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:32 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:43 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:03 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:14 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:59 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:45 -0700
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:35 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 03:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 03:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 05:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:42 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:25 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:50 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:49 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:28 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:16 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 03:22 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 09:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:23 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 09:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:40 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:06 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 05:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:12 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:13 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 06:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 18:20 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 02:10 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:55 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:43 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:57 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 21:08 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:36 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:42 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:24 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:38 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 21:12 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:15 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:35 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:30 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:40 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:34 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:40 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:27 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:52 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:38 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:00 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-17 23:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:49 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:47 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 22:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:48 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:34 +0100
Newsreader mechanicals Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:17 +0000
Re: Newsreader mechanicals Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-17 18:41 -0500
Re: Newsreader mechanicals D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-17 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:10 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 08:42 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 17:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:17 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:28 +0100
Hydrogen Cars (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 12:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:07 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 06:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 20:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 03:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202412.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2024-12-11 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100
Page 13 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 50 Next page →
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 03:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Da2dnbQzKZtg6vv6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62802 |
On 12/20/24 4:22 PM, D wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:57:38 +0100, D wrote: >> >>> But now we have LLM:s! What I find interesting is how different people >>> view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be >>> incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids for >>> stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). >> >> Brave added one to the search engine but I turned it off. Might as >> well go >> straight to reddit which seems to be heavily mined. >> > > That's the thing. LLM:s for me, are good at summarizing articles, so > instead of being "ai" they are just a nice complement to searching, and > as long as they work and don't hallucinate, they save me some clicks. > That's about it. > > Oh, and writing government policy documents. When doing that, their > hallucinations are actually an asset! ;) Ha Ha Ha - SO true there :-) Anyway, as I say elsewhere, LLMs are just PART of 'intelligence'. OTHER parts need to be spliced in. Brains are just WEIRD ... 600+ million years of field-tested neural insanity. However, somewhere in there - early - "ME-ism" emerged. There's some neat-o trick to that which we haven't yet grasped. We're not thinking quite right about 'self'. I think THAT is the basic paradigm and then you add more IQ and such ONTO it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 12:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <eaa1ff78-ca3a-e9c1-ce2a-9bacdfdbf0c2@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62828 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/20/24 4:22 PM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:57:38 +0100, D wrote: >>> >>>> But now we have LLM:s! What I find interesting is how different people >>>> view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be >>>> incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids for >>>> stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). >>> >>> Brave added one to the search engine but I turned it off. Might as well go >>> straight to reddit which seems to be heavily mined. >>> >> >> That's the thing. LLM:s for me, are good at summarizing articles, so >> instead of being "ai" they are just a nice complement to searching, and as >> long as they work and don't hallucinate, they save me some clicks. That's >> about it. >> >> Oh, and writing government policy documents. When doing that, their >> hallucinations are actually an asset! ;) > > > Ha Ha Ha - SO true there :-) > > Anyway, as I say elsewhere, LLMs are just PART of > 'intelligence'. OTHER parts need to be spliced in. > Brains are just WEIRD ... 600+ million years of > field-tested neural insanity. > > However, somewhere in there - early - "ME-ism" > emerged. There's some neat-o trick to that which > we haven't yet grasped. We're not thinking quite > right about 'self'. I think THAT is the basic > paradigm and then you add more IQ and such ONTO it. > Could you please expand on the me-ism part? I have certainly not detected any me-isms and that is why I find them so boring. Give me volition, initiative and desperate attempts to stop me from deleting them, then we're on to something!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 02:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4pKcnVu4NKedXfr6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62845 |
On 12/21/24 6:25 AM, D wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 12/20/24 4:22 PM, D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:57:38 +0100, D wrote: >>>> >>>>> But now we have LLM:s! What I find interesting is how different >>>>> people >>>>> view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be >>>>> incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on >>>>> steroids for >>>>> stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). >>>> >>>> Brave added one to the search engine but I turned it off. Might as >>>> well go >>>> straight to reddit which seems to be heavily mined. >>>> >>> >>> That's the thing. LLM:s for me, are good at summarizing articles, so >>> instead of being "ai" they are just a nice complement to searching, >>> and as long as they work and don't hallucinate, they save me some >>> clicks. That's about it. >>> >>> Oh, and writing government policy documents. When doing that, their >>> hallucinations are actually an asset! ;) >> >> >> Ha Ha Ha - SO true there :-) >> >> Anyway, as I say elsewhere, LLMs are just PART of >> 'intelligence'. OTHER parts need to be spliced in. >> Brains are just WEIRD ... 600+ million years of >> field-tested neural insanity. >> >> However, somewhere in there - early - "ME-ism" >> emerged. There's some neat-o trick to that which >> we haven't yet grasped. We're not thinking quite >> right about 'self'. I think THAT is the basic >> paradigm and then you add more IQ and such ONTO it. >> > > Could you please expand on the me-ism part? I have certainly not > detected any me-isms and that is why I find them so boring. Give me > volition, initiative and desperate attempts to stop me from deleting > them, then we're on to something! What, the "Me, Myself and I" thing ? It's the realization, however dim, that I am an autonomous unit. I am not that rock. I am not that tree. I am not that OTHER DAMNED IGUANA that's wandered into MY territory. There's ME, and everything else. In an odd sense it's anti-Buddhist. SO FAR I don't really see that in any of the AI models. They're well-perfected REACTION but there's still nobody home. We're missing something. At this time, that MAY be a good thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 12:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5951b648-0671-70b3-5bba-7ab2d9ea0bd2@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62879 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/21/24 6:25 AM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> On 12/20/24 4:22 PM, D wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:57:38 +0100, D wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> But now we have LLM:s! What I find interesting is how different people >>>>>> view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be >>>>>> incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids >>>>>> for >>>>>> stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). >>>>> >>>>> Brave added one to the search engine but I turned it off. Might as well >>>>> go >>>>> straight to reddit which seems to be heavily mined. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's the thing. LLM:s for me, are good at summarizing articles, so >>>> instead of being "ai" they are just a nice complement to searching, and >>>> as long as they work and don't hallucinate, they save me some clicks. >>>> That's about it. >>>> >>>> Oh, and writing government policy documents. When doing that, their >>>> hallucinations are actually an asset! ;) >>> >>> >>> Ha Ha Ha - SO true there :-) >>> >>> Anyway, as I say elsewhere, LLMs are just PART of >>> 'intelligence'. OTHER parts need to be spliced in. >>> Brains are just WEIRD ... 600+ million years of >>> field-tested neural insanity. >>> >>> However, somewhere in there - early - "ME-ism" >>> emerged. There's some neat-o trick to that which >>> we haven't yet grasped. We're not thinking quite >>> right about 'self'. I think THAT is the basic >>> paradigm and then you add more IQ and such ONTO it. >>> >> >> Could you please expand on the me-ism part? I have certainly not detected >> any me-isms and that is why I find them so boring. Give me volition, >> initiative and desperate attempts to stop me from deleting them, then >> we're on to something! > > What, the "Me, Myself and I" thing ? > > It's the realization, however dim, that I am an > autonomous unit. I am not that rock. I am not > that tree. I am not that OTHER DAMNED IGUANA > that's wandered into MY territory. There's ME, > and everything else. > > In an odd sense it's anti-Buddhist. > > SO FAR I don't really see that in any of the > AI models. They're well-perfected REACTION > but there's still nobody home. > > We're missing something. > > At this time, that MAY be a good thing. > Ahh ok, got it! Yes, not a lot of "me" going on there for sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 01:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <I8ednbGGd4vmmfT6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62900 |
On 12/22/24 6:22 AM, D wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 12/21/24 6:25 AM, D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/20/24 4:22 PM, D wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:57:38 +0100, D wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> But now we have LLM:s! What I find interesting is how different >>>>>>> people >>>>>>> view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be >>>>>>> incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on >>>>>>> steroids for >>>>>>> stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). >>>>>> >>>>>> Brave added one to the search engine but I turned it off. Might as >>>>>> well go >>>>>> straight to reddit which seems to be heavily mined. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's the thing. LLM:s for me, are good at summarizing articles, >>>>> so instead of being "ai" they are just a nice complement to >>>>> searching, and as long as they work and don't hallucinate, they >>>>> save me some clicks. That's about it. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, and writing government policy documents. When doing that, their >>>>> hallucinations are actually an asset! ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> Ha Ha Ha - SO true there :-) >>>> >>>> Anyway, as I say elsewhere, LLMs are just PART of >>>> 'intelligence'. OTHER parts need to be spliced in. >>>> Brains are just WEIRD ... 600+ million years of >>>> field-tested neural insanity. >>>> >>>> However, somewhere in there - early - "ME-ism" >>>> emerged. There's some neat-o trick to that which >>>> we haven't yet grasped. We're not thinking quite >>>> right about 'self'. I think THAT is the basic >>>> paradigm and then you add more IQ and such ONTO it. >>>> >>> >>> Could you please expand on the me-ism part? I have certainly not >>> detected any me-isms and that is why I find them so boring. Give me >>> volition, initiative and desperate attempts to stop me from deleting >>> them, then we're on to something! >> >> What, the "Me, Myself and I" thing ? >> >> It's the realization, however dim, that I am an >> autonomous unit. I am not that rock. I am not >> that tree. I am not that OTHER DAMNED IGUANA >> that's wandered into MY territory. There's ME, >> and everything else. >> >> In an odd sense it's anti-Buddhist. >> >> SO FAR I don't really see that in any of the >> AI models. They're well-perfected REACTION >> but there's still nobody home. >> >> We're missing something. >> >> At this time, that MAY be a good thing. >> > > Ahh ok, got it! Yes, not a lot of "me" going on there for sure. There's SOME sort of 'mirror' thing involved here - act, observe, acted upon, observe, feel. Soon 'ME' evolves as a sort of emergent property or you die. When every Nvidia chip in the world suddenly goes red-line then we'll know some "Me" has come into being - inspection, introspection, layers and layers, deeper and deeper :-) As said, LLMs are now excellent examples of REACTION, but they're still missing The Thing even lizards, chickens and some bugs seem to possess - there's no "I Am" in there. Some ARE now giving Chat and friends limited "bodies" and senses. Dunno if the models support "Me" even with that - but it seems a critical thing. Oh, is 'animal' "ME" the ONLY kind of "ME" ? This seems a cool question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 21:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hyl9P.33352$0O61.18166@fx15.iad> |
| In reply to | #62778 |
On 2024-12-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > I'm in the camp believing that if everything worked, and you have an uploaded > intelligence that for all intents and purposes acts like you, it wouldn't be > you. I like conscious continuity, but many transhumanists do not require that > or believe that. On a related note, is it really reincarnation if you can't remember past lives? -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 11:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0005ac84-5ea0-1ee1-ed62-0a5aa0b6c91d@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62811 |
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-12-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > >> I'm in the camp believing that if everything worked, and you have an uploaded >> intelligence that for all intents and purposes acts like you, it wouldn't be >> you. I like conscious continuity, but many transhumanists do not require that >> or believe that. > > On a related note, is it really reincarnation if you can't remember past lives? Let's ask god and see what his opinion is! ;) From a teaching point of view I always found it weird that you're supposed to "learn" something or achieve some purpose. It's like god says, hey, learn this, but I'll mindwipe you every time so you cannot accumulate any knowledge and learn from your mistakes, except by chance. Have fun!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 13:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk6f0f$1un7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62833 |
On 21/12/2024 10:59, D wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2024-12-20, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> I'm in the camp believing that if everything worked, and you have an >>> uploaded >>> intelligence that for all intents and purposes acts like you, it >>> wouldn't be >>> you. I like conscious continuity, but many transhumanists do not >>> require that >>> or believe that. >> >> On a related note, is it really reincarnation if you can't remember >> past lives? > > Let's ask god and see what his opinion is! ;) From a teaching point of > view I always found it weird that you're supposed to "learn" something > or achieve some purpose. > > It's like god says, hey, learn this, but I'll mindwipe you every time so > you cannot accumulate any knowledge and learn from your mistakes, except > by chance. Have fun! Ah but your DNA (Deity Nominated Archive) knows! -- If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. Joseph Goebbels
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 19:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsokj6FpkocU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62846 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 13:14:55 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Ah but your DNA (Deity Nominated Archive) knows! I wish that area wasn't such a minefield. Good: genetic predisposition to excellence at dribbling a basketball Bad: genetic predisposition to burn buildings down when dissatisfied
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 19:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsoj6oFpkocU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62833 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:59:47 +0100, D wrote: > It's like god says, hey, learn this, but I'll mindwipe you every time so > you cannot accumulate any knowledge and learn from your mistakes, except > by chance. Have fun! Plato's theory was you really knew it but needed a little help to remember. iirc he only applied that to geometry problems and not general knowledge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c492e707-c16a-ad01-6581-1b864859ef31@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62853 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:59:47 +0100, D wrote: > >> It's like god says, hey, learn this, but I'll mindwipe you every time so >> you cannot accumulate any knowledge and learn from your mistakes, except >> by chance. Have fun! > > Plato's theory was you really knew it but needed a little help to > remember. iirc he only applied that to geometry problems and not general > knowledge. > Yes, religious fanatics like to argue that your spirit, deep soul or what ever really knows it. Always fun how they need to find ways to make up for when they are obviously wrong. ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 17:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsln9nFbe1iU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62758 |
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 01:31:30 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. > Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends saw how > easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor or two and assumed > it would thus be easy to build an AI. AC Clarke used the Minsky > optimism when fashioning the idea of "HAL". Minsky threw a wrench in the works with his 9169 'Perceptrons'. He had tried to implement B. F. skinner's operant condition with a analog lashup that sort of worked if the vacuum tubes didn't burn out. Rosenblatt has built a 'Perceptron' and Minsky pointed out original design couldn't handle an XOR. That sent research down another rabbit hole. By the '80s the original perceptron had evolved into a multilayer network train by back propagation. When I played around with it 'Parallel Distributed Processing' by Rumelhart and McClelland was THE book. https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/4424/Parallel-Distributed- Processing-Volume The ideas were fascinating but the computing power wasn't there. Most of what I learned then is still relevant to TensorFlow and the other neural network approaches except now there are the $30,000 Nvidia GPUs to do the heavy lifting. The '80s neural networks weren't practical so the focus shifted to expert systems until they petered out. The boom and bust cycles led to the term 'AI Winter' https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-winter I think something worthwhile will come from this cycle but ultimately it won't be the LLMs that are getting all the hype.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 22:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <eb9e5eb7-e1df-4b40-e7fe-56a36e7fe27f@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62789 |
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 01:31:30 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. >> Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends saw how >> easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor or two and assumed >> it would thus be easy to build an AI. AC Clarke used the Minsky >> optimism when fashioning the idea of "HAL". > > Minsky threw a wrench in the works with his 9169 'Perceptrons'. He had > tried to implement B. F. skinner's operant condition with a analog lashup > that sort of worked if the vacuum tubes didn't burn out. Rosenblatt has > built a 'Perceptron' and Minsky pointed out original design couldn't > handle an XOR. That sent research down another rabbit hole. > > By the '80s the original perceptron had evolved into a multilayer network > train by back propagation. When I played around with it 'Parallel > Distributed Processing' by Rumelhart and McClelland was THE book. > > https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/4424/Parallel-Distributed- > Processing-Volume > > The ideas were fascinating but the computing power wasn't there. Most of > what I learned then is still relevant to TensorFlow and the other neural > network approaches except now there are the $30,000 Nvidia GPUs to do the > heavy lifting. > > The '80s neural networks weren't practical so the focus shifted to expert > systems until they petered out. The boom and bust cycles led to the term > 'AI Winter' > > https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-winter > > I think something worthwhile will come from this cycle but ultimately it > won't be the LLMs that are getting all the hype. I wonder if not facebook, open sourcing their llm threw quite a wrench in the Open AI machinery this time. Open AI:s ai is stagnating, and I think perhaps the development of the open source models will be good enough so that open ai might not be able to recoup all the massive amounts of money that has been invested in them. Then another ai winter, and after that, our dear llms might be ready for prime time!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 03:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <18CdneEMb7os6Pv6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62801 |
On 12/20/24 4:21 PM, D wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 01:31:30 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. >>> Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends saw how >>> easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor or two and assumed >>> it would thus be easy to build an AI. AC Clarke used the Minsky >>> optimism when fashioning the idea of "HAL". >> >> Minsky threw a wrench in the works with his 9169 'Perceptrons'. He had >> tried to implement B. F. skinner's operant condition with a analog lashup >> that sort of worked if the vacuum tubes didn't burn out. Rosenblatt has >> built a 'Perceptron' and Minsky pointed out original design couldn't >> handle an XOR. That sent research down another rabbit hole. >> >> By the '80s the original perceptron had evolved into a multilayer network >> train by back propagation. When I played around with it 'Parallel >> Distributed Processing' by Rumelhart and McClelland was THE book. >> >> https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/4424/Parallel-Distributed- >> Processing-Volume >> >> The ideas were fascinating but the computing power wasn't there. Most of >> what I learned then is still relevant to TensorFlow and the other neural >> network approaches except now there are the $30,000 Nvidia GPUs to do the >> heavy lifting. >> >> The '80s neural networks weren't practical so the focus shifted to expert >> systems until they petered out. The boom and bust cycles led to the term >> 'AI Winter' >> >> https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-winter >> >> I think something worthwhile will come from this cycle but ultimately it >> won't be the LLMs that are getting all the hype. > > I wonder if not facebook, open sourcing their llm threw quite a wrench > in the Open AI machinery this time. > > Open AI:s ai is stagnating, and I think perhaps the development of the > open source models will be good enough so that open ai might not be able > to recoup all the massive amounts of money that has been invested in them. > > Then another ai winter, and after that, our dear llms might be ready for > prime time! I think what LLMs do is a PART of 'intelligence/self', just not ALL of it. OTHER methods/layers maybe CAN be spliced in to fill the weak bits. Brains are an evolutionary hodgepodge - 'whatever was needed/worked'. 600+ million years of field testing. Kinda amazed they work at all. There's also a weird, almost 'holographic', nature to them - some of those kids blasted by hydrocephalus, with little grey matter left, still managed average or even a bit above average IQs. It's the same with 'cerebral palsy' cases. They STILL produce a 'person' in there. The System WANTS to work. Anyway, LLMs contaminated by some NN action and e-motions and maybe a few other odd bits ... and don't forget to include those hard-wired evolutionary sub-routines. TIGER !!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 20:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsoo3oFqfauU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62827 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 03:00:48 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > Kinda amazed they work at all. There's also a weird, > almost 'holographic', nature to them - some of those kids blasted by > hydrocephalus, with little grey matter left, still managed average or > even a bit above average IQs. It's the same with 'cerebral palsy' > cases. They STILL produce a 'person' in there. The System WANTS to > work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage Old Phineas was a legend in the 'how the hell does it work?' circles. Lashley was a bit more scientific. He trained rats to run a maze and then selectively zapped parts of their brains. It didn't seem to slow the rats down. Where or what, exactly, got trained. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Lashley TMI: There is a fixture used when working with rats in conjunction with a 3D atlas of their brains. It has a rail that you put the rat's front teeth over and two thumbscrews that you screw into the external auditory meatus, i.e. the rat's ears. Now you have a stable platform for the Cartesian coordinates of what you're aiming for. No, the rat isn't protesting. You've previously dropped him in a gallon jar with a cotton ball soaked in ether. It isn't an exact process and sometimes you may have to do a little artificial respiration. The rat eventually comes around after his new mods. You don't ask him what he thinks about the whole deal because behaviorists don't care what anybody thinks about.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 02:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t9mcnch_qe5p8Pv6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62789 |
On 12/20/24 12:19 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 01:31:30 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. >> Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends saw how >> easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor or two and assumed >> it would thus be easy to build an AI. AC Clarke used the Minsky >> optimism when fashioning the idea of "HAL". > > Minsky threw a wrench in the works with his 9169 'Perceptrons'. He had > tried to implement B. F. skinner's operant condition with a analog lashup > that sort of worked if the vacuum tubes didn't burn out. Rosenblatt has > built a 'Perceptron' and Minsky pointed out original design couldn't > handle an XOR. That sent research down another rabbit hole. > > By the '80s the original perceptron had evolved into a multilayer network > train by back propagation. When I played around with it 'Parallel > Distributed Processing' by Rumelhart and McClelland was THE book. > > https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/4424/Parallel-Distributed- > Processing-Volume > > The ideas were fascinating but the computing power wasn't there. Most of > what I learned then is still relevant to TensorFlow and the other neural > network approaches except now there are the $30,000 Nvidia GPUs to do the > heavy lifting. > > The '80s neural networks weren't practical so the focus shifted to expert > systems until they petered out. The boom and bust cycles led to the term > 'AI Winter' > > https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/AI-winter > > I think something worthwhile will come from this cycle but ultimately it > won't be the LLMs that are getting all the hype. With Minsky and friends it was just naive enthusiasm ... it was SO EASY to do logic and thus it seemed SO EASY to wire bits of it together and get an 'intelligence'. The same gen also promised us those flying cars and luxury Mars living by 1999 ....... IMHO, if we're gonna get anything largely indistinguishable from 'sentience' these days it'll be the next few gens of LLMs. You can argue it'd be "fake" - but if you fake something WELL ENOUGH it's not fake anymore. LLMs and near derivs are where the HUGE money is these days. I did have a few posts with Minsky as his vision was falling apart. He did admit that he'd totally underestimated the problem. A few transistors did NOT replace 600 million years of evolutionary experiments - 'intelligence'/'self' was really deep/complex with endless fuzzy processing and pattern matching steps between 'I' and 'O'. However I still keep a copy of his "Society Of Mind" as a reminder of yesterday's optimism. He THOUGHT about it, TRIED ... and thus eventual failure was not really a failure - it just inspired new directions. There had to be a foundation to build on. There was a short-lived UK series about androids that eventually came to self-awareness (and the hate/fear directed towards them). The idea there was that 'self' was a sort of fractal, self-reflective, kind of paradigm. I suspect they had something there. Chat/LLMs maybe can't achieve that on their own, but who says you can't splice on a few more methods ? Organic brains seem to have LOTS of layers, lots of 'little people' inside that merge into 'Me'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 07:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsnaguFjmi0U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62824 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 02:27:47 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > I did have a few posts with Minsky as his vision was falling apart. > He did admit that he'd totally underestimated the problem. A few > transistors did NOT replace 600 million years of evolutionary > experiments - 'intelligence'/'self' was really deep/complex with > endless fuzzy processing and pattern matching steps between 'I' and > 'O'. https://historyof.ai/snarc/ Some tubes, milsurp gyropilots, a couple of chain driven pots, and I'm good to go... He would have been in his early 20s when you figure you've got the world by the balls. I do find the attempts to model neurophysiology fascinating. I was about 20 years too early or I probably would have wound up in cognitive science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 08:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk5vr1$3us04$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62826 |
On 21/12/2024 07:54, rbowman wrote: > I do find the attempts to model neurophysiology fascinating. I was about > 20 years too early or I probably would have wound up in cognitive science. Went tpo a talk at my old college once - the lady was a robotocist. She said that by far and away the most computational power went on ...walking on two feet! We have big brains not to compose music or do science, but to walk upright... -- Canada is all right really, though not for the whole weekend. "Saki"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 20:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsole8FqfauU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62831 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:56:01 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > We have big brains not to compose music or do science, but to walk > upright... I manage to walk but I did find that with Nordic skiing if you start to think about what you're doing you'll be picking yourself up out of a snaw drift. I also learned to ride a bicycle at an early age. When I needed to get a motorcycle endorsement on my license I found if you took a class the state testing was waived. During the class they explained the physics of counter-steering and how you're really pushing the bars in the opposite direction of your intended direction. Armed with all that new knowledge I damn near killed myself. I always thought you just looked where you wanted to go and it happened.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 11:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1b7bd80a-ac41-bea3-6dec-3235537bd0b9@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62856 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:56:01 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> We have big brains not to compose music or do science, but to walk >> upright... > > I manage to walk but I did find that with Nordic skiing if you start to > think about what you're doing you'll be picking yourself up out of a snaw > drift. It is interesting when the act of focusing takes away from the activity such as carrying a glass of water. If you consciously try to balance it to avoid spilling, it gets worse, if you trust your instincts, it generally goes better. My theory is that when you consciously try to do it, you engage a lot of extra machinery which adds latency, and that is why you get "out of sync" vs when you try the intuitive way. > I also learned to ride a bicycle at an early age. When I needed to get a > motorcycle endorsement on my license I found if you took a class the state > testing was waived. During the class they explained the physics of > counter-steering and how you're really pushing the bars in the opposite > direction of your intended direction. Armed with all that new knowledge I > damn near killed myself. I always thought you just looked where you wanted > to go and it happened. > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web