Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD?

From	7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux
Subject	Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD?
Followup-To	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux
Message-ID	<H4Lar.16022$VY2.3692@fx05.am4> (permalink)
Organization	virginmedia.com
Date	2012-03-22 19:29 +0000

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux

Show all headers | View raw

Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Looking around at prices and advances in technology,
next year will see sub 20nm SSD manufacturing and
100GB SSDs costing $50 or thereabouts.

What to do with all that computing power?

Excuse us, one thing that is bugging me this moment.
Who says Linux had to format an SSD and why???????????

Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 19:29 +0000
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-22 20:14 +0000
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 20:16 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-03-22 21:31 +0100
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 20:43 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-03-22 21:52 +0100
            Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Henk & Ingrid" <Henk_Ingrid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-22 22:56 +0100
              Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-22 22:04 -0400
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-22 21:14 +0000
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 22:46 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 16:29 +0100
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-26 23:43 +0300
            Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-26 16:03 -0600
              Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-27 02:38 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 15:39 +0000
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-23 12:55 -0400
          Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000
          Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000
            Re: Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-23 13:15 -0400
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:25 +0000
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 15:46 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2012-03-23 22:27 +0100
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 21:42 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-25 09:08 -0400
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-22 17:18 -0400
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Greg Hennessy <me@privacy.org> - 2012-03-23 23:02 +1100

csiph-web