Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #225

Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD?

From "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux
Subject Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD?
Date 2012-03-25 09:08 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jkn5bo$dgu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <H4Lar.16022$VY2.3692@fx05.am4> <nees39xn85.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> <rV0br.31894$LC3.19312@fx12.am4> <1POdneWXv_1Md_HSnZ2dnUVZ8gqdnZ2d@lyse.net> <k76br.31003$ue1.1945@fx15.am4>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"7" <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> wrote in message 
news:k76br.31003$ue1.1945@fx15.am4...
> David Brown wrote:
>
>> On 23/03/12 16:46, 7 wrote:
>>> Chris Davies wrote:
>>>
>>>> 7<email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com>  wrote:
>>>>> Who says Linux had to format an SSD and why???????????
>>>>
>>>> Presumably you do, and on that basis you should be the best placed to
>>>> answer the second part of the question...?
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for that lead in! :-)
>>
>>
>> And how about a lead out - maybe you'd like to try and learn something
>> about SSDs, flash, disks, filesystems, ram, and pretty much everything
>> else you've got wrong here before continuing?
>
>
> If any of what you rant about has anything to with reality or is
> in with the topic, invite yourself back.

If any of the nonsense that you rant about has anything to do with reality 
then you should invite yourself back.

Once AGAIN - you seem know absolutely nothing about anything and aren't shy 
about exposing your ignorance.


-- 
"I've done for example SQL optimization and the reason I could do it better 
than the best high level experts can do was because I think in hex and bits 
and byte movements.

If you know the assembler in detail, you would know what "select * from 
employees" would translate into assembler and how different and yet similar 
that would be from "select name from employees"


Babbling idiot "7"
March 7, 2012
<qAN5r.607$ya.432@newsfe03.ams2>


Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 19:29 +0000
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-22 20:14 +0000
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 20:16 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-03-22 21:31 +0100
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 20:43 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-03-22 21:52 +0100
            Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Henk & Ingrid" <Henk_Ingrid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-22 22:56 +0100
              Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-22 22:04 -0400
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-22 21:14 +0000
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 22:46 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 16:29 +0100
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-26 23:43 +0300
            Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-26 16:03 -0600
              Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-27 02:38 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 15:39 +0000
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-23 12:55 -0400
          Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000
          Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000
            Re: Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-23 13:15 -0400
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:25 +0000
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 15:46 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2012-03-23 22:27 +0100
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 21:42 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-25 09:08 -0400
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-22 17:18 -0400
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Greg Hennessy <me@privacy.org> - 2012-03-23 23:02 +1100

csiph-web