Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups

From	7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com>
Subject	Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux
References	(2 earlier) <DMLar.46912$mH5.16276@fx06.am4> <jkgmb8$830$1@news.albasani.net> <8ilt39-b5k.ln1@sky.matrix> <rO0br.31887$LC3.14456@fx12.am4> <jki9th$fei$1@dont-email.me>
Followup-To	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux
Message-ID	<s82br.40681$wt2.7389@fx17.am4> (permalink)
Organization	virginmedia.com
Date	2012-03-23 17:10 +0000

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux

Show all headers | View raw

Ezekiel wrote:


> A


abuse@eternal-september.org


Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar troll trolling Linux
newsgroups.


Just because appil and micoshaft are loosing business to Linux,
thats not a good reason for Burson-Marstelar employees to be
trolling Linux newsgroups on their behalf.

Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 19:29 +0000
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-22 20:14 +0000
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 20:16 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-03-22 21:31 +0100
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 20:43 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-03-22 21:52 +0100
            Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Henk & Ingrid" <Henk_Ingrid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-22 22:56 +0100
              Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-22 22:04 -0400
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-22 21:14 +0000
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-22 22:46 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 16:29 +0100
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-26 23:43 +0300
            Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-03-26 16:03 -0600
              Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-03-27 02:38 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 15:39 +0000
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-23 12:55 -0400
          Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000
          Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000
            Re: Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-23 13:15 -0400
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-03-22 20:25 +0000
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 15:46 +0000
      Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2012-03-23 22:27 +0100
        Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-03-23 21:42 +0000
          Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-25 09:08 -0400
  Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-03-22 17:18 -0400
    Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? Greg Hennessy <me@privacy.org> - 2012-03-23 23:02 +1100

csiph-web