Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172386
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building |
| Date | 2013-04-07 18:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CD8769EB.18AD0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | <CD847E42.1884E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <b2e65490-015f-469b-b872-2dbde837d565@i5g2000pbj.googlegroups.com> <kjssfj$8q2$2@news.albasani.net> |
On 4/7/13 3:37 PM, in article kjssfj$8q2$2@news.albasani.net, "Nobody"
<invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/2013 3:21 PM, Mark S Bilk wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 1:12 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> <http://bit.ly/Z70nWB>
>>> -----
> [...]
>>
>> Compressed air can't shoot clouds of girders sideways.
>
> I saw no "clouds of girders" in any videos I've seen of the collapse of
> the WTC towers.
>
And there was more than *air* in the building. Really... nobody took out all
the innards... and if they had how come we see so much other stuff being
ejected and falling with the building?
Bilk has gone completely insane.
--
Brad cc Wiggins:
-----
Clearly, I don't understand what I read.
-----
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-05 13:12 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-05 13:21 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-04-05 22:34 +0200
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-05 14:19 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-05 14:31 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-05 23:37 +0200
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-05 14:54 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-06 00:31 +0200
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-05 15:44 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-06 01:05 +0200
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-04-06 16:08 +0200
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-06 10:16 -0400
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 11:54 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-05 16:31 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-05 16:26 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-06 16:55 -0700
Re: NO LINUX CONTENT ( Was Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building) soup <cheezsoupnews@hotmail.com> - 2013-04-07 10:19 +0100
Re: NO LINUX CONTENT ( Was Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-07 07:45 -0400
Re: NO LINUX CONTENT ( Was Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 12:55 +0100
Re: NO LINUX CONTENT ( Was Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building) Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 06:32 -0700
Re: NO LINUX CONTENT ( Was Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 09:20 -0700
Re: NO LINUX CONTENT ( Was Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building) GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-07 11:11 -0600
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 10:30 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 11:18 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 11:44 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:08 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-07 13:03 -0600
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 17:37 -0500
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:22 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-05 16:49 -0400
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-05 16:18 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-05 23:34 +0100
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-05 16:34 -0700
Re: Ok, a real one for Bilk - no explosives in the building 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-06 15:08 +0100
csiph-web