Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #70373

Re: Why Python 3?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'run-time': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'explicit': 0.07; 'float': 0.07; 'result,': 0.07; 'integers': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '(floor': 0.16; '2.2,': 0.16; '__future__': 0.16; 'behave': 0.16; 'decimal.': 0.16; 'division.': 0.16; 'gained': 0.16; 'integer.': 0.16; 'integers,': 0.16; 'operands': 0.16; 'quoted': 0.16; 'ways:': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'typing': 0.19; 'import': 0.22; 'affects': 0.24; 'byte': 0.24; 'bytes': 0.24; 'integer': 0.24; 'text,': 0.24; 'unicode': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '3.x': 0.31; 'decimal': 0.31; 'division': 0.31; 'styles': 0.31; 'convert': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'consistent': 0.36; 'opposed': 0.36; 'picking': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'form,': 0.38; 'needed': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; "you're": 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'side': 0.67; 'between': 0.67; 'divide': 0.84; 'bless': 0.91; 'mistake': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Z3AogUIpOUyclSVRsrAwwesUHbEKIxEF61lk4mvurWs=; b=ixnuj2xiNpU2TuZwTomg+AGMfP072L4k2yJmgOqsVPp3XFhBqp2YBXa+r5h4kyinnZ gDDuA35b8vADJ9qde464St+lVyq7Kc7VTlRL9g6kQIE29P9pcAfHF1nJo/+CGQFwJJ9x 9/kibC5i+h8X0cQQWmHTR0BgX+E7kHo5InxcxdQu83VBK1uYo6e3tbkBPltGRQ6Pz4M2 1qikWiZBBHvl9jHoH8C5kZbopXML+WTfw+AVB0K9L7Ae+MlssIUT+7RTZeU4q/NTkMZ+ w1tHuaF4UToVvOrXAnwBizHzOW2gOY66Eqr/FbRrAXXiQIhsobv4kE0G3oH4kwL1TMkg pGnA==
X-Received by 10.194.189.201 with SMTP id gk9mr20247508wjc.13.1397899551657; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 02:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmqAeuFnOmW890ykPkk4L7JpgYFtFpd6uk1xAXtt2MgBMw@mail.gmail.com>
References <mailman.9344.1397878113.18130.python-list@python.org> <7x8ur1esa5.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <CAPTjJmqAeuFnOmW890ykPkk4L7JpgYFtFpd6uk1xAXtt2MgBMw@mail.gmail.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Sat, 19 Apr 2014 03:25:11 -0600
Subject Re: Why Python 3?
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.9353.1397899558.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 31
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1397899558 news.xs4all.nl 2885 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39431
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:70373

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> That'll make Python 2.6/2.7 behave like Python 3.x in three ways:
> firstly, "print" will be a function instead of a statement (and it's
> more powerful than the statement form, as well as being more
> flexible); secondly, quoted strings will be Unicode strings, not byte
> strings (that'll help you to start thinking about what's bytes and
> what's text, which is an important distinction in Python 3); and
> thirdly, though less important than the others, the division of two
> integers will result in a floating point, not an integer. I personally
> think the last one was a mistake on Python 3's part (why bless float
> specifically? what if you're working with integers and
> decimal.Decimals?), but if you're going to move to Python 3, you may
> as well have your code start working that way, so you get used to
> typing // to divide integers and get an integer (floor division).

If you're working with decimals, then the result is a decimal.  If one
side is an integer and the other is a decimal, then the result is
still a decimal.  Similarly if one of the operands is a fraction, then
the result is a fraction.  The change from / denoting "classic
division" to "true division" really only affects the case where both
operands are integers, so far as I'm aware.  If you want to divide two
integers and get a decimal result, then convert one or both of them to
decimals first; you would have needed to do the same with classic
division.

We also gained a consistent and explicit way to differentiate between
the two different styles of division that classic division
represented, as opposed to picking at run-time based on type.

As for "why float" specifically, the division __future__ import has
been around since 2.2, longer than either decimals or fractions.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Python 3? Anthony Papillion <papillion@gmail.com> - 2014-04-18 22:28 -0500
  Re: Why Python 3? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-18 23:40 -0700
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 17:34 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-04-19 09:26 -0400
        Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 23:42 +1000
        Re: Why Python 3? Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-19 10:57 -0700
        Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 10:07 +0000
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 03:25 -0600
      Re: Why Python 3? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-04-19 12:59 +0300
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 19:37 +1000
      Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 11:02 +0000
        Re: Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2014-04-20 15:38 +0300
          Re: Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 15:09 +0000
        Re: Integer and float division [was Re: Why Python 3?] Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 11:44 +1200
    Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-19 13:23 -0400
      Re: Why Python 3? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-19 20:25 -0700
        Re: Why Python 3? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-04-20 19:15 +1000
        Re: Why Python 3? Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2014-04-20 23:50 +0000
          Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 10:00 +1000
            Re: Why Python 3? HoneyMonster <nobody@someplace.invalid> - 2014-04-21 04:08 +0000
          Re: Why Python 3? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-04-21 01:11 +0100
    Re: Why Python 3? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-04-19 18:31 +0100
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 03:53 +1000
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 13:58 -0600
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 06:31 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-20 13:06 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 11:28 +1000
          Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 10:52 +1200
            Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 09:24 +1000
              Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-21 03:43 +0000
                Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 14:43 +1000
                Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-22 09:58 +1200
                Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 14:48 +1000
                Re: Why Python 3? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-04-21 02:42 -0700
                Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-22 10:28 +1200
                Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 08:43 +1000
                Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-22 18:03 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-20 00:17 -0400
          Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 11:13 +1200
            Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-20 20:09 -0400
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 14:38 -0600
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 06:53 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-20 13:35 +1200
    Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-20 09:59 +0000
      Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 20:57 -0700
        Re: Unicode in Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-22 01:44 -0400
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 23:18 -0700
            Re: Unicode in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 16:32 +1000
        Re: Unicode in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-22 06:11 +0000
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 23:30 -0700
            Re: Unicode in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 16:44 +1000
            Re: Unicode in Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-04-22 02:07 -0700
              Re: Unicode in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-22 12:21 +0000
                Re: Unicode in Python wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-04-22 08:28 -0700
        Re: Unicode in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 00:31 -0600
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 02:23 -0700
          Re: Unicode in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 11:09 -0700
    Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 10:22 -0600
      Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 11:56 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 18:29 -0600
    Re: Why Python 3? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-04-20 17:41 +0100
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 02:46 +1000
      Re: Why Python 3? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-04-20 14:40 -0700
        Re: Why Python 3? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-04-20 17:58 -0400
        Re: Why Python 3? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-04-20 18:02 -0400
          Re: Why Python 3? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-04-21 12:22 +1200
        Re: Why Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-04-21 02:13 +0000
  Re: Why Python 3? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2014-04-19 13:53 +0200
    Re: Why Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 22:46 +1000
    Re: Why Python 3? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 08:59 -0700
  Re: Why Python 3? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2014-04-19 07:41 -0700
  Re: Why Python 3? Thomas Lehmann <thomas.lehmann.private@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-06 09:28 -0700

csiph-web