Re: which async framework?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'programmer': 0.03; 'high- level': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'useless': 0.09; 'antoine': 0.16; 'irks': 0.16; 'loops': 0.16; 'programmers.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:which': 0.16; 'do,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'apply.': 0.24; 'frameworks': 0.24; 'right.': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'programming.': 0.30; 'libraries': 0.31; 'trivial': 0.31; 'cases': 0.33; 'case,': 0.35; 'usual': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'more': 0.64; 'details': 0.65; 'careless': 0.84; 'piled': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com>
Subject	Re: which async framework?
Date	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:36:11 +0000 (UTC)
References	<531E22DF.7030709@simplistix.co.uk> <1733040935416225908.878896sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> <loom.20140311T170030-477@post.gmane.org> <372076480416251284.821607sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> <loom.20140311T193409-649@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	27-183-11.connect.netcom.no
User-Agent	NewsTap/4.0.1 (iPad)
X-
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.8061.1394570198.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	21
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1394570198 news.xs4all.nl 2943 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52182
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:68238

Show key headers only | View raw

Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:

> This is the usual assumption that high-level libraries are made of useless
> cruft piled up by careless programmers. 

It often is the case, particularly in network programming.

But in this case the programmer is Guido, so it doesn't apply. :)

> What irks me with your response is that you phrased it as though writing
> a good event loop was an almost trivial thing to do, which it is not
> once you start considering multiple use cases and constraints. 

Right. But in my programs an event loops does not have multiple usecases. I
know all the details about my usecase. 

I am more concerned that multiple frameworks have their own event loops. 

Sturla

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: which async framework? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 20:36 +0000

csiph-web