Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #68238 > unrolled thread

Re: which async framework?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: which async framework? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 20:36 +0000

#68238 — Re: which async framework?

Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:

> This is the usual assumption that high-level libraries are made of useless
> cruft piled up by careless programmers. 

It often is the case, particularly in network programming.

But in this case the programmer is Guido, so it doesn't apply. :)


> What irks me with your response is that you phrased it as though writing
> a good event loop was an almost trivial thing to do, which it is not
> once you start considering multiple use cases and constraints. 

Right. But in my programs an event loops does not have multiple usecases. I
know all the details about my usecase. 

I am more concerned that multiple frameworks have their own event loops. 

Sturla

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web