Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #68238
| From | Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: which async framework? |
| Date | 2014-03-11 20:36 +0000 |
| References | <531E22DF.7030709@simplistix.co.uk> <1733040935416225908.878896sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> <loom.20140311T170030-477@post.gmane.org> <372076480416251284.821607sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> <loom.20140311T193409-649@post.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8061.1394570198.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > This is the usual assumption that high-level libraries are made of useless > cruft piled up by careless programmers. It often is the case, particularly in network programming. But in this case the programmer is Guido, so it doesn't apply. :) > What irks me with your response is that you phrased it as though writing > a good event loop was an almost trivial thing to do, which it is not > once you start considering multiple use cases and constraints. Right. But in my programs an event loops does not have multiple usecases. I know all the details about my usecase. I am more concerned that multiple frameworks have their own event loops. Sturla
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: which async framework? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 20:36 +0000
csiph-web