Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #68238

Re: which async framework?

From Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com>
Subject Re: which async framework?
Date 2014-03-11 20:36 +0000
References <531E22DF.7030709@simplistix.co.uk> <1733040935416225908.878896sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> <loom.20140311T170030-477@post.gmane.org> <372076480416251284.821607sturla.molden-gmail.com@news.gmane.org> <loom.20140311T193409-649@post.gmane.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.8061.1394570198.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:

> This is the usual assumption that high-level libraries are made of useless
> cruft piled up by careless programmers. 

It often is the case, particularly in network programming.

But in this case the programmer is Guido, so it doesn't apply. :)


> What irks me with your response is that you phrased it as though writing
> a good event loop was an almost trivial thing to do, which it is not
> once you start considering multiple use cases and constraints. 

Right. But in my programs an event loops does not have multiple usecases. I
know all the details about my usecase. 

I am more concerned that multiple frameworks have their own event loops. 

Sturla

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: which async framework? Sturla Molden <sturla.molden@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 20:36 +0000

csiph-web