Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<lac@openend.se>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'plug': 0.09; 'received:openend.se': 0.09; 'received:theraft.openend.se': 0.09; 'subject:2.7': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; '2.7': 0.13; 'cc:addr:lac': 0.16; 'cc:addr:openend.se': 0.16; 'cc:name:python': 0.16; 'from:addr:lac': 0.16; 'from:addr:openend.se': 0.16; 'from:name:laura creighton': 0.16; 'message-id:@fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'received:89.233': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217.133': 0.16; 'received:fido': 0.16; 'received:fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'simulate': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'laura': 0.18; 'runs': 0.18; 'all,': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'fix': 0.21; 'machine': 0.21; 'cc:21': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:20': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; 'figure': 0.27; 'tech': 0.27; 'does,': 0.29; 'received:se': 0.29; 'running.': 0.29; 'board': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'running': 0.34; 'machines': 0.35; 'skip:> 10': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'really': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'things': 0.38; 'version': 0.38; 'architecture': 0.38; 'enough': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'still': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'jul': 0.72; 'received:89': 0.80; 'friend': 0.81; 'dead.': 0.84; 'working,': 0.84
To	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
cc	Python <python-list@python.org>, lac@openend.se
From	Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se>
Subject	Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
In-Reply-To	Message from Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> of "Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600." <CALwzidn6WjoMEWO3fcdFnmpnvp4U-8eK8YBjytWbe6wopDRYew@mail.gmail.com>
References	<tjreedy@udel.edu> <moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <201507190927.t6J9RVqM017606@fido.openend.se><CALwzidn6WjoMEWO3fcdFnmpnvp4U-8eK8YBjytWbe6wopDRYew@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID	<30316.1437329670.1@fido>
Date	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:14:30 +0200
X-Greylist	Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (theraft.openend.se [89.233.217.130]); Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:14:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.734.1437329684.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	19
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1437329684 news.xs4all.nl 2918 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60032
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
X-Received-Bytes	4274
X-Received-Body-CRC	57385534
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:94145

Show key headers only | View raw

In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600, Ian Kelly writes:
>I think this is an unrealistic and unattainable goal. Even if you stop
>patching your Python 2.7 version altogether, what about the
>environment that it runs in? Are you going to stop patching the OS
>forever? Are you going to fix the current machine architecture exactly
>as it is, forever? I don't know if industrial code uses a network much
>or at all, but if it does, are you never going to upgrade your network
>infrastructure?

There is clearly some wishful thinking going around here, but
in terms of having the same machine architecture forever ... well, my
friend the hardware guy can make you a board that you can plug your
old perfectly working, reliable 1970s tech machines into -- because they
really want to be plugged into a pdp-11 running RSX-11.  Then we fake
things using Python to simulate enough RSX-11 to keep on running.

We figure the machines will still be running long after we are dead.

Laura

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-19 20:14 +0200

csiph-web