Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #94145 > unrolled thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

Started byLaura Creighton <lac@openend.se>
First post2015-07-19 20:14 +0200
Last post2015-07-19 20:14 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-19 20:14 +0200

#94145 — Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

FromLaura Creighton <lac@openend.se>
Date2015-07-19 20:14 +0200
SubjectRe: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
Message-ID<mailman.734.1437329684.3674.python-list@python.org>
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600, Ian Kelly writes:
>I think this is an unrealistic and unattainable goal. Even if you stop
>patching your Python 2.7 version altogether, what about the
>environment that it runs in? Are you going to stop patching the OS
>forever? Are you going to fix the current machine architecture exactly
>as it is, forever? I don't know if industrial code uses a network much
>or at all, but if it does, are you never going to upgrade your network
>infrastructure?

There is clearly some wishful thinking going around here, but
in terms of having the same machine architecture forever ... well, my
friend the hardware guy can make you a board that you can plug your
old perfectly working, reliable 1970s tech machines into -- because they
really want to be plugged into a pdp-11 running RSX-11.  Then we fake
things using Python to simulate enough RSX-11 to keep on running.

We figure the machines will still be running long after we are dead.

Laura

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web