Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94145
| From | Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? |
| References | <tjreedy@udel.edu> <moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <201507190927.t6J9RVqM017606@fido.openend.se><CALwzidn6WjoMEWO3fcdFnmpnvp4U-8eK8YBjytWbe6wopDRYew@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-07-19 20:14 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.734.1437329684.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600, Ian Kelly writes: >I think this is an unrealistic and unattainable goal. Even if you stop >patching your Python 2.7 version altogether, what about the >environment that it runs in? Are you going to stop patching the OS >forever? Are you going to fix the current machine architecture exactly >as it is, forever? I don't know if industrial code uses a network much >or at all, but if it does, are you never going to upgrade your network >infrastructure? There is clearly some wishful thinking going around here, but in terms of having the same machine architecture forever ... well, my friend the hardware guy can make you a board that you can plug your old perfectly working, reliable 1970s tech machines into -- because they really want to be plugged into a pdp-11 running RSX-11. Then we fake things using Python to simulate enough RSX-11 to keep on running. We figure the machines will still be running long after we are dead. Laura
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-19 20:14 +0200
csiph-web