Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #94145

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

From Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se>
Subject Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
References <tjreedy@udel.edu> <moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <201507190927.t6J9RVqM017606@fido.openend.se><CALwzidn6WjoMEWO3fcdFnmpnvp4U-8eK8YBjytWbe6wopDRYew@mail.gmail.com>
Date 2015-07-19 20:14 +0200
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.734.1437329684.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600, Ian Kelly writes:
>I think this is an unrealistic and unattainable goal. Even if you stop
>patching your Python 2.7 version altogether, what about the
>environment that it runs in? Are you going to stop patching the OS
>forever? Are you going to fix the current machine architecture exactly
>as it is, forever? I don't know if industrial code uses a network much
>or at all, but if it does, are you never going to upgrade your network
>infrastructure?

There is clearly some wishful thinking going around here, but
in terms of having the same machine architecture forever ... well, my
friend the hardware guy can make you a board that you can plug your
old perfectly working, reliable 1970s tech machines into -- because they
really want to be plugged into a pdp-11 running RSX-11.  Then we fake
things using Python to simulate enough RSX-11 to keep on running.

We figure the machines will still be running long after we are dead.

Laura

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-19 20:14 +0200

csiph-web