Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #16942

Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:bug': 0.04; 'ubuntu': 0.04; 'bug.': 0.07; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'release,': 0.09; 'since.': 0.09; 'exception': 0.12; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:ever': 0.16; 'url:thread': 0.16; 'examples': 0.16; 'linux': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; '2.x': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; 'programming': 0.21; 'subject:information': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code': 0.25; "i'm": 0.26; 'bugs': 0.28; 'fixed': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'closer': 0.30; 'publicly': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.34; 'url:python': 0.36; 'minimal': 0.37; 'response,': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'run': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'subject:from': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'john': 0.62; 'url:groups': 0.64
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback?
Date Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:00:05 -0500
References <3d377e6e-3da3-4e94-9e3f-999557488211@c16g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To <3d377e6e-3da3-4e94-9e3f-999557488211@c16g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3489.1323493234.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 19
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1323493234 news.xs4all.nl 6890 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48386
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16942

Show key headers only | View raw

On 12/9/2011 6:14 PM, John Ladasky wrote:

> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/751b7050c756c995#
>
> I'm programming in Python 2.6 on Ubuntu Linux 10.10, if it matters.

It might, as many bugs have been fixed since.
Can you try the same code with the most recent 2.x release, 2.7.2?
Do you have working and non-working code that you can publicly release?
Can you reduce the size and dependencies so the examples are closer to 
'small' than 'large'? And in any case, self-contained?

In my first response, I said you might have found a bug. A bogus 
exception message qualifies. But to do much, we need minimal good/bad 
examples that run or not on a current release (2.7.2 or 3.2.2).

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-09 15:14 -0800
  Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-10 00:00 -0500
    Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-10 09:53 -0800
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-10 12:38 -0600
        Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-10 11:02 -0800
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 06:02 +1100
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-10 18:57 -0500

csiph-web