Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:bug': 0.04; 'ubuntu': 0.04; 'bug.': 0.07; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'release,': 0.09; 'since.': 0.09; 'exception': 0.12; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:ever': 0.16; 'url:thread': 0.16; 'examples': 0.16; 'linux': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; '2.x': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; 'programming': 0.21; 'subject:information': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code': 0.25; "i'm": 0.26; 'bugs': 0.28; 'fixed': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'closer': 0.30; 'publicly': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.34; 'url:python': 0.36; 'minimal': 0.37; 'response,': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'run': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'subject:from': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'john': 0.62; 'url:groups': 0.64 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:00:05 -0500 References: <3d377e6e-3da3-4e94-9e3f-999557488211@c16g2000pre.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <3d377e6e-3da3-4e94-9e3f-999557488211@c16g2000pre.googlegroups.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1323493234 news.xs4all.nl 6890 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48386 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16942 On 12/9/2011 6:14 PM, John Ladasky wrote: > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/751b7050c756c995# > > I'm programming in Python 2.6 on Ubuntu Linux 10.10, if it matters. It might, as many bugs have been fixed since. Can you try the same code with the most recent 2.x release, 2.7.2? Do you have working and non-working code that you can publicly release? Can you reduce the size and dependencies so the examples are closer to 'small' than 'large'? And in any case, self-contained? In my first response, I said you might have found a bug. A bogus exception message qualifies. But to do much, we need minimal good/bad examples that run or not on a current release (2.7.2 or 3.2.2). -- Terry Jan Reedy