Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback?

From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback?
Date	2011-12-10 18:57 -0500
References	<3d377e6e-3da3-4e94-9e3f-999557488211@c16g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <mailman.3489.1323493234.27778.python-list@python.org> <41081049-1047-41ca-b7c1-5e5c3c00e94b@f33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4EE3A726.6010201@gmail.com> <CAPTjJmo1KbE72sxvaPikb3B770kQJUDQU-16hUGNs6WEi1Zu9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.3502.1323561450.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/10/2011 2:02 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:

> There's a few differences between 2.6 and 2.7; not usually enough to
> be concerned about in daily use, but when dealing with weird issues,
> it helps to have the latest release.

There are 2 issues. First, 2.7.2 has perhaps a couple hundred bug fixes 
since 2.7.0/2.6.6 were released. So it is possible that this particular 
problem was fixed, or at least changed. Second (leaving security issues 
aside), a Py2 bug fix will only be applied to the post-2.7.2 tip and 
only after the bug has been demonstrated to exist in the post-2.7.2 tip.

About the request for minimal code exhibiting the problem: each bug 
exposes a hole in the test suite. We try to add a new test case with 
each bug fix so fixed bugs stay fixed. So code examples not only show 
that the bug is in the latest version, but also serve as the basis for 
new tests.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-09 15:14 -0800
  Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-10 00:00 -0500
    Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-10 09:53 -0800
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-10 12:38 -0600
        Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-10 11:02 -0800
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 06:02 +1100
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-10 18:57 -0500

csiph-web