Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #16964

Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback?

References <3d377e6e-3da3-4e94-9e3f-999557488211@c16g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <mailman.3489.1323493234.27778.python-list@python.org> <41081049-1047-41ca-b7c1-5e5c3c00e94b@f33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4EE3A726.6010201@gmail.com>
Date 2011-12-11 06:02 +1100
Subject Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback?
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3498.1323543772.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 11:53 AM, John Ladasky wrote:
>> Why did you specify Python 2.7.2, instead of the 2.7.6 version that is
>> being offered to me by Ubuntu Software Center?  Does it matter?
> There is no Python 2.7.6. I think you have it confused with the version
> 2.7.2-6. If I'm not mistaken, that appended 6 has to do with packaging
> and nothing at all to do with the software itself.

On 12/9/2011 6:14 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
> I'm programming in Python 2.6 on Ubuntu Linux 10.10, if it matters.

As with my Ubuntu 10.10 - it's version 2.6.6. (I also altinstalled 3.3
built straight from Mercurial, which is approximately as new a Python
as one can have, but that doesn't count.)

There's a few differences between 2.6 and 2.7; not usually enough to
be concerned about in daily use, but when dealing with weird issues,
it helps to have the latest release.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-09 15:14 -0800
  Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-10 00:00 -0500
    Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-10 09:53 -0800
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-10 12:38 -0600
        Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-10 11:02 -0800
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 06:02 +1100
      Re: Multiprocessing bug, is information ever omitted from a traceback? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-10 18:57 -0500

csiph-web