Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26409
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Pass data to a subprocess |
| Date | Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:29:09 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Lines | 48 |
| Message-ID | <jve2rl$9f2$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <CAF_E5JY5FgEJub7tNNzZEj0tri8Z7oPZUSLOLtD+5f0t7Yv+Yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF_E5JY2sEsauXM-teW4hTHePqFCYK6z+9oLMZcjVWFyYs+gKg@mail.gmail.com> <5017EFB0.6080608@shopzeus.com> <CAF_E5JaEHxsjKoHRhZLzh+YdPU8UqKHae9efCsP7zEvm_37+2w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2809.1343809166.4697.python-list@python.org> <jvbdoj$rat$1@reader1.panix.com> <mailman.2830.1343831530.4697.python-list@python.org> <jvc160$a1b$1@reader1.panix.com> <mailman.2853.1343887874.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | dsl.comtrol.com |
| X-Trace | reader1.panix.com 1343917749 9698 64.122.56.22 (2 Aug 2012 14:29:09 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@panix.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:29:09 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:26409 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2012-08-02, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> wrote:
>
>> I still don't get it. shm_unlink() works the same way unlink() does.
>> The resource itself doesn't cease to exist until all open file
>> handles are closed. From the shm_unlink() man page on Linux:
>>
>> The operation of shm_unlink() is analogous to unlink(2): it
>> removes a shared memory object name, and, once all processes
>> have unmapped the object, de-allocates and destroys the
>> contents of the associated memory region. After a successful
>> shm_unlink(), attempts to shm_open() an object with the same
>> name will fail (unless O_CREAT was specified, in which case a
>> new, distinct object is created).
>>
>> Even if the parent calls shm_unlink(), the shared-memory resource
>> will continue to exist (and be usable) until all processes that are
>> holding open file handles unmap/close them. So not only will
>> detached children not crash, they'll still be able to use the shared
>> memory objects to talk to each other.
Note that when I say the detached children will still be able to talk
to each other using shared memory after the parent calls shm_unlink()
and exit(), I'm talking about the general case -- not specifically
about the multiprocessing module. There may be something else going on
with the multiprocessing module.
> I stand corrected. It should still be examined, what kind shared
> memory is used under non-linux systems. System V on AIX? And what
> about Windows? So maybe the general answer is still no. But I guess
> that the OP wanted this to work on a specific system.
>
> Dear Andrea Crotti! Please try to detach two child processes, exit
> from the main process, and communicate over a multiprocessing queue.
> It will possibly work. Sorry for my bad advice.
I'm not claiming it will work, since I don't know how the IPC in the
multiprocessing module works. It may indeed break when a child
process is detatched (which I'm assuming means being removed from the
process group and/or detached from the controlling tty).
But, I'm not aware of any underlying Unix IPC mechanism that breaks
when a child is detached, so I was curious about what would cause
multiprocessing's IPC to break.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I didn't order any
at WOO-WOO ... Maybe a YUBBA
gmail.com ... But no WOO-WOO!
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 10:19 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 06:59 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:07 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:26 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 14:25 +0100
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 15:07 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 14:16 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:32 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 19:48 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-02 08:10 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-02 14:29 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-02 13:21 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:42 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 16:24 +0100
csiph-web