Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26381
| Date | 2012-08-02 08:10 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> |
| Subject | Re: Pass data to a subprocess |
| References | (3 earlier) <CAF_E5JaEHxsjKoHRhZLzh+YdPU8UqKHae9efCsP7zEvm_37+2w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2809.1343809166.4697.python-list@python.org> <jvbdoj$rat$1@reader1.panix.com> <mailman.2830.1343831530.4697.python-list@python.org> <jvc160$a1b$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2853.1343887874.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
> I still don't get it. shm_unlink() works the same way unlink() does. > The resource itself doesn't cease to exist until all open file handles > are closed. From the shm_unlink() man page on Linux: > > The operation of shm_unlink() is analogous to unlink(2): it > removes a shared memory object name, and, once all processes > have unmapped the object, de-allocates and destroys the > contents of the associated memory region. After a successful > shm_unlink(), attempts to shm_open() an object with the same > name will fail (unless O_CREAT was specified, in which case a > new, distinct object is created). > > Even if the parent calls shm_unlink(), the shared-memory resource will > continue to exist (and be usable) until all processes that are holding > open file handles unmap/close them. So not only will detached > children not crash, they'll still be able to use the shared memory > objects to talk to each other. > I stand corrected. It should still be examined, what kind shared memory is used under non-linux systems. System V on AIX? And what about Windows? So maybe the general answer is still no. But I guess that the OP wanted this to work on a specific system. Dear Andrea Crotti! Please try to detach two child processes, exit from the main process, and communicate over a multiprocessing queue. It will possibly work. Sorry for my bad advice.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 10:19 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 06:59 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:07 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:26 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 14:25 +0100
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 15:07 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 14:16 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:32 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 19:48 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-02 08:10 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-02 14:29 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-02 13:21 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:42 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 16:24 +0100
csiph-web