Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #26357

Re: Pass data to a subprocess

References (1 earlier) <CAF_E5JY2sEsauXM-teW4hTHePqFCYK6z+9oLMZcjVWFyYs+gKg@mail.gmail.com> <5017EFB0.6080608@shopzeus.com> <CAF_E5JaEHxsjKoHRhZLzh+YdPU8UqKHae9efCsP7zEvm_37+2w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2809.1343809166.4697.python-list@python.org> <roy-DBE17E.06593701082012@news.panix.com>
Date 2012-08-01 14:25 +0100
Subject Re: Pass data to a subprocess
From andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2826.1343827504.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


2012/8/1 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com>:
> In article <mailman.2809.1343809166.4697.python-list@python.org>,
>  Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think that is correct. Instead of detaching a child process, you
>> can create independent processes and use other frameworks for IPC. For
>> example, Pyro.  It is not as effective as multiprocessing.Queue, but in
>> return, you will have the option to run your service across multiple
>> servers.
>
> You might want to look at beanstalk (http://kr.github.com/beanstalkd/).
> We've been using it in production for the better part of two years.  At
> a 30,000 foot level, it's an implementation of queues over named pipes
> over TCP, but it takes care of a zillion little details for you.
>
> Setup is trivial, and there's clients for all sorts of languages.  For a
> Python client, go with beanstalkc (pybeanstalk appears to be
> abandonware).
>>
>> The most effective IPC is usually through shared memory. But there is no
>> OS independent standard Python module that can communicate over shared
>> memory.
>
> It's true that shared memory is faster than serializing objects over a
> TCP connection.  On the other hand, it's hard to imagine anything
> written in Python where you would notice the difference.
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


That does look nice and I would like to have something like that..
But since I have to convince my boss of another external dependency I
think it might be worth
to try out zeromq instead, which can also do similar things and looks
more powerful, what do you think?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 10:19 +0200
  Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 06:59 -0400
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:07 +0200
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:26 +0200
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 14:25 +0100
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 15:07 -0400
  Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 14:16 +0000
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:32 +0200
      Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 19:48 +0000
        Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-02 08:10 +0200
          Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-02 14:29 +0000
        Re: Pass data to a subprocess Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-02 13:21 -0400
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:42 +0200
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 16:24 +0100

csiph-web