Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15887 > unrolled thread

Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 07:50 +0000
    Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 03:05 -0700
      Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 03:59 -0700
        Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 04:28 -0700
          Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 16:53 -0700
    Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 03:56 -0700
      Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 11:07 +0000
        Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 04:15 -0700
          NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 11:21 +0000
            Re: NOMINATION: Nadegda for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 16:52 -0700
              Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 12:21 +0000
                Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-10 06:00 -0700
                  Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 13:47 +0000
                    Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-10 13:41 -0700
                      Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 21:50 +0000
                        Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-11 05:46 -0700

#15887 — Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot

On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:33:38 +0000, [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler wrote:

> The voting starts now for the June 2012 Kook Awards.
> 
> Keep in mind that the voting process will go on for the entire month of
> July, with the results being announced on or about 31 July 2012.
> 
> Invite your friends, and cross-post the Offishul AUK Voting Roster to
> your favorite haunts. Let's see if we can't get it cross-posted to at
> least 1000 higher-volume froups, mmmkay?
> 
> After all, we want to send the old guard out with a bang. Or at least
> with a swift kick to the ass.
> 
> Socks are encouraged to vote. In fact, the sockpuppeteer who can prove
> his socks contributed the most to the voting process will receive a
> special commendation by decree of the FNVW.
> 
> For your vote to count, you must post the entire, unaltered Offishul
> Voting Ballot, in this thread. All other ballots shall be dealt with as
> the FNVW sees fit.
> 
> The roster below is a bit different than you're used to seeing. I shall
> endeavor to explain the voting process to you now.
> 
> Unlike the old, stale kook awards, the new kook awards lists each person
> up for an award, then what awards they're up for. This makes it easier
> to vote only for those kooks you've been following.
> 
> Notice the box '[ ]' to the left of each award. If you enter a '+' in
> that box, that's a vote in the positive. A '-' in that box represents a
> vote in the negative. Leaving the box blank represents an abstention.
> 
> The boxes with the 'X' are FNVW decreed awards, and thus are not
> eligible to be voted on, as they've already been awarded. Changing these
> has no effect.
> 
> Tell your friends, tell your enemies. Vote early, vote often.
> 
> ================================================== Bit
> [X]= Offishul AUK Comedian; by FNVW decree 25Jun2012
> 
> Bit Rot
> [X]= Offishul AUK Ball Polisher; by FNVW decree 22Jun2012 [ ]= Pathetic
> Anal Pineapple Award; Nominated by Anon; Second by Janithor.
> 
> Checkmate
> [X]= Checkmate "Trapped In The Closet" Award; by FNVW decree; Second by
> The Second Sock.

[+]= Clueless Newbie Of The Month Award; Nominated by Anonymous; Second
by DAVE TV.

Absolutely.

[+]= Gay-Married Husband For Rent Award; Nominated by Ms. Kitty; Second
by FNVW.

And ass-reamed by *persent*, of all people. He has *kooks* that are his 
superiors in every respect, and incessantly-starts-all-caps-threads-
hourly type kooks at that.

> [X]= Offishul AUK Rectal Bottle Opener; by FNVW decree 22Jun2012 [X]=
> Offishul AUK AssClown; by FNVW decree 22Jun2012
> 
> Emmett Gulley

[+]= Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award; Trainer of Albatross;
Nominated by Janithor; second by DAVE TV.

Absofrigginglutely.

[-]= Hammer of Thor Award;
Nominated by DAVE TV; Second by Anonymous, Janithor.

Come on. Take Thor a *bit* more seriously. :)

> Fred Hall

[+]= Kook of the Month Award; Nominated by Janithor; Second by Phoenix,
DAVE TV.

Are you kidding?

[+]= The Office of Usenet Drunk; Nominated by DAVE TV; Second by
Janithor.

Again: are you kidding?

[+]= Tinfoil Sombrero Award; Nominated by Janithor; Second by
DAVE TV.

Self-evident, I should say.

> Highway to Hell
> [X]= Offishul AUK Prognosticator; by FNVW decree 25Jun2012
> 
> Irkin Invader Zim / cainster@windstream.net / Frank Drebbin [X]=
> Offishul AUK Stubborn, DeLULsional Idiot; by FNVW decree 26Jun2012
> 
> kachina candente (aka Shiny)
> [X]= Offishul AUK Dirty Slut; by FNVW decree 20Jun2012
> 
> Keeper of Truth
> [X]= Offishul AUK Congenital Liar And Genital Washer; by FNVW decree
> 20Jun2012
> 
> Knoxy
> [ ]= Knoxy Master Emasculator Award; Emasculator of Checkmate; Nominated
> by Persent; Second by FNVW.

Who?

> Murphy/phhlatArse/Flash/etc.

[+]= Busted Urinal Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The Second
Sock.

Pee-yew, phlatArse! You let one! You let one too many! You let a few 
thousand too many.

[+]= Drama Queen Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The Second
Sock.

As a witness to the extraordinary temper tantrum he threw in eternal-
september.support AGAIN the other day, I approve this candidate. And now 
the coward's taken to forging regulars' "From" headers to throw his 
tantrums too. But I'd recognize his foul stench anywhere.

[+]= Emmett Gulley Obsesso Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by
The Second Sock.

I've never seen anyone so obsessed. You can't take two steps on usenet 
these days without tripping over a long and pointless thread punctuated 
by multiple of his socks and the name "derbyshire". :P And these pop up 
in the darndest of places. Besides eternal-september.support, in 
rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, comp.lang.java programmer at minimum. Not to 
mention auk, though he seems to be posting here less of late -- I wonder 
why? >;-)

[-]= Goofy Azzed Baboon Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The Second
Sock.

Nah. I've seen much more mangled language from, for instance, ALIEN. Or 
even tholen. He might have been a contender a couple years ago during his 
phlatArse phase, though, had he ever been nominated.

[+]= Order of the Holey Sockpuppet Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by
The Second Sock.

Dweeb's changing nym sometimes two, three times a day now! And keeping 
several going at a time. "Hydra-Blanky" is currently the longest lived in 
use -- at a whole frigging WEEK of age.

And despite their youth, there's something ... dirty about each and every 
one of his socks.

Of course, his chief opponent, the "Murphy Foam Detoxification Squad", is 
probably a single person nymshifting, and if so is nymshifting just as 
much, but hey, he wasn't nominated and murphy was. >;-)

[+]= Unabomber Surprise Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The Second
Sock.

Textwall-a-day based on what I've seen. And now he's taken to giant 
screed-filled ranting sigs too, a sure sign he's begun his final 
evolution into an Omega Kook of the same magnitude as Greegor and Kent 
Wills and all those others with a giant list of someone else's alleged 
crimes peppered with dozens of dubious weblinks for a sig.

> pandora
> [ ]= Clueless Newbie Of The Month Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by
> Janithor, The Second Sock.
> [X]= Offishul AUK Antique; by FNVW decree 22Jun2012
>
> Persent

Oh, what the hell.

[+]= Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award; Trainer of Checkmate;
Nominated by Janithor; Second by javax.swing.JSnarker

> Steve Crook
> [ ]= Gene Spafford "Usenet Samaritan" Award; Nominated by Account
> Banned; Second by FNVW, Cujo DeSockpuppet.
> 
> This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms
> Of Use
> [X]= Offishul AUK Spankling; by FNVW decree 25Jun2012
>
> tholen

[+]= Pavlov's Bell Lifetime Achievement Award; Nominated by Ahnold;
Second by The Second Sock.

That's one well-trained kook. All of Usenet should win the Barbara 
Woodhouse jointly for training it, too.

> Yours Truly,Johnny Dollar

[+]= Blistered Ass Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by The Second Sock.

Uh-huh. Only because Arfatzio isn't up for this one, though.

[-]= Clueless Newbie Of The Month Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by
Janithor.

Must give Checkmate every chance here. Sorry, Dollar.

> [X]= Offishul AUK Coward; by FNVW decree 20Jun2012 [X]= Offishul AUK
> Sniffer Of A Drunkard's Yeasty Crotch; by FNVW decree 25Jun2012

And now, for the pièce de résistance:

[+]= Pathetic Anal Pineapple Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by The
Second Sock, Janithor.

And how.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#15888

On Jul 9, 3:50 am, Nadegda wrote:
3> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

3> [+]= Clueless Newbie Of The Month Award; Nominated by Anonymous;
3> Second by DAVE TV.
3>
3> Absolutely.
3>
3> [+]= Gay-Married Husband For Rent Award; Nominated by Ms. Kitty;
3> Second by FNVW.
3>
3> And ass-reamed by *persent*, of all people. He has *kooks* that
3> are his superiors in every respect, and incessantly-starts-all-
3> caps-threads-hourly type kooks at that.

3> [+]= Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award; Trainer of
3> Albatross; Nominated by Janithor; second by DAVE TV.
3>
3> Absofrigginglutely.
3>
3> [-]= Hammer of Thor Award;
3> Nominated by DAVE TV; Second by Anonymous, Janithor.
3>
3> Come on. Take Thor a *bit* more seriously. :)

3> [+]= Kook of the Month Award; Nominated by Janithor; Second by
3> Phoenix, DAVE TV.
3>
3> Are you kidding?
3>
3> [+]= The Office of Usenet Drunk; Nominated by DAVE TV; Second by
3> Janithor.
3>
3> Again: are you kidding?
3>
3> [+]= Tinfoil Sombrero Award; Nominated by Janithor; Second by
3> DAVE TV.
3>
3> Self-evident, I should say.

What does any of that have to do with television, OS/2, or Java,
Nadegda?

3> Who?

What does your question of Wrangler have to do with television, OS/2,
or Java, Nadegda?

3> [+]= Busted Urinal Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The
3> Second Sock.
3>
3> Pee-yew, phlatArse! You let one! You let one too many! You let a
3> few thousand too many.

What does murphy's flatulence have to do with television, OS/2, or
Java, Nadegda?

3> [+]= Drama Queen Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The Second
3> Sock.
3>
3> As a witness to the extraordinary temper tantrum he threw in
3> eternal-september.support AGAIN the other day, I approve this
3> candidate. And now the coward's taken to forging regulars' "From"
3> headers to throw his tantrums too. But I'd recognize his foul
3> stench anywhere.

What do murphy's tantrums, forgeries, and stench have to do with
television, OS/2, or Java, Nadegda?

3> [+]= Emmett Gulley Obsesso Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by
3> The Second Sock.
3>
3> I've never seen anyone so obsessed. You can't take two steps on
3> usenet these days without tripping over a long and pointless
3> thread punctuated by multiple of his socks and the name
3> "derbyshire". :P And these pop up in the darndest of places.
3> Besides eternal-september.support, in rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv,
3> comp.lang.java programmer at minimum. Not to mention auk, though
3> he seems to be posting here less of late -- I wonder why? >;-)

Who is "derbyshire", Nadegda? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.

3> [-]= Goofy Azzed Baboon Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The
3> Second Sock.
3>
3> Nah. I've seen much more mangled language from, for instance,
3> ALIEN. Or even tholen. He might have been a contender a couple
3> years ago during his phlatArse phase, though, had he ever been
3> nominated.

What do murphy's nominations have to do with television, OS/2, or
Java, Nadegda?

3> [+]= Order of the Holey Sockpuppet Award; Nominated by Ahnold;
3> Second by The Second Sock.
3>
3> Dweeb's changing nym sometimes two, three times a day now! And
3> keeping several going at a time. "Hydra-Blanky" is currently the
3> longest lived in use -- at a whole frigging WEEK of age.

What does murphy's nymshifting have to do with television, OS/2, or
Java, Nadegda?

3> And despite their youth, there's something ... dirty about each
3> and every one of his socks.

What does murphy's filth have to do with television, OS/2, or Java,
Nadegda?

3> Of course, his chief opponent, the "Murphy Foam Detoxification
3> Squad", is probably a single person nymshifting, and if so is
3> nymshifting just as much, but hey, he wasn't nominated and murphy
3> was. >;-)

What does that have to do with television, OS/2, or Java, Nadegda?

3> [+]= Unabomber Surprise Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The
3> Second Sock.
3>
3> Textwall-a-day based on what I've seen. And now he's taken to
3> giant screed-filled ranting sigs too, a sure sign he's begun his
3> final evolution into an Omega Kook of the same magnitude as
3> Greegor and Kent Wills and all those others with a giant list of
3> someone else's alleged crimes peppered with dozens of dubious
3> weblinks for a sig.

What do murphy's screeds, rants, and general failure at netiquette
have to do with television, OS/2, or Java, Nadegda?

3> Oh, what the hell.
3>
3> [+]= Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award; Trainer of
3> Checkmate; Nominated by Janithor; Second by javax.swing.JSnarker

What does your foul language have to do with television, OS/2, or
Java, Nadegda?

3> [+]= Pavlov's Bell Lifetime Achievement Award; Nominated by
3> Ahnold; Second by The Second Sock.
3>
3> That's one well-trained kook. All of Usenet should win the Barbara
3> Woodhouse jointly for training it, too.

What does tholen's training have to do with television or Java,
Nadegda?

3> [+]= Blistered Ass Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by The Second
3> Sock.
3>
3> Uh-huh. Only because Arfatzio isn't up for this one, though.
3>
3> [-]= Clueless Newbie Of The Month Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second
3> by Janithor.
3>
3> Must give Checkmate every chance here. Sorry, Dollar.

What does your apology have to do with television, OS/2, or Java,
Nadegda?

3> And now, for the pièce de résistance:
3>
3> [+]= Pathetic Anal Pineapple Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by
3> The Second Sock, Janithor.
3>
3> And how.

What does that have to do with television, OS/2, or Java, Nadegda?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15889

thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> writes:

186> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

186> What does any of that have to do with television, OS/2, or Java,
186> Nadegda?

186> What does your question of Wrangler have to do with television,
OS/2,
186> or Java, Nadegda?

186> What does murphy's flatulence have to do with television, OS/2,
or
186> Java, Nadegda?

186> What do murphy's tantrums, forgeries, and stench have to do with
186> television, OS/2, or Java, Nadegda?

186> Who is "derbyshire", Nadegda? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using
186> that alias.

186> What do murphy's nominations have to do with television, OS/2, or
186> Java, Nadegda?

186> What does murphy's nymshifting have to do with television, OS/2,
or
186> Java, Nadegda?

186> What does murphy's filth have to do with television, OS/2, or
Java,
186> Nadegda?

186> What does that have to do with television, OS/2, or Java,
Nadegda?

186> What do murphy's screeds, rants, and general failure at
netiquette
186> have to do with television, OS/2, or Java, Nadegda?

186> What does your foul language have to do with television, OS/2, or
186> Java, Nadegda?

186> What does tholen's training have to do with television or Java,
186> Nadegda?

186> What does your apology have to do with television, OS/2, or Java,
186> Nadegda?

186> What does that have to do with television, OS/2, or Java,
Nadegda?

Rather ironic that you should suddenly show any interest in relevance
to the newsgroup, "thoolen".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15894

On Jul 9, 6:59 am, "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:
/!\> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

/!\> Rather ironic that you should suddenly show any interest in
relevance
/!\> to the newsgroup, "thoolen".

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
television, OS/2, or Java, tholen-bot?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15907

thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> writes:

195> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

195> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
195> television, OS/2, or Java, tholen-bot?

Who is "tholen-bot", "thoolen"?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias with that puncutation, "thoolen".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15890

Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:

1> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

1> [+]= Clueless Newbie Of The Month Award; Nominated by Anonymous;
Second
1> by DAVE TV.

1> Absolutely.

1> [+]= Gay-Married Husband For Rent Award; Nominated by Ms. Kitty;
Second
1> by FNVW.

1> And ass-reamed by *persent*, of all people. He has *kooks* that are
his
1> superiors in every respect, and incessantly-starts-all-caps-
threads-
1> hourly type kooks at that.

1> [+]= Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award; Trainer of
Albatross;
1> Nominated by Janithor; second by DAVE TV.

1> Absofrigginglutely.

1> [-]= Hammer of Thor Award;
1> Nominated by DAVE TV; Second by Anonymous, Janithor.

1> Come on. Take Thor a *bit* more seriously. :)

1> [+]= Kook of the Month Award; Nominated by Janithor; Second by
Phoenix,
1> DAVE TV.

1> Are you kidding?

1> [+]= The Office of Usenet Drunk; Nominated by DAVE TV; Second by
1> Janithor.

1> Again: are you kidding?

1> [+]= Tinfoil Sombrero Award; Nominated by Janithor; Second by
1> DAVE TV.

1> Self-evident, I should say.

1> Who?

1> [+]= Busted Urinal Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The Second
1> Sock.

1> Pee-yew, phlatArse! You let one! You let one too many! You let a
few
1> thousand too many.

1> [+]= Drama Queen Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The Second
1> Sock.

1> As a witness to the extraordinary temper tantrum he threw in
eternal-
1> september.support AGAIN the other day, I approve this candidate.
And now
1> the coward's taken to forging regulars' "From" headers to throw
his
1> tantrums too. But I'd recognize his foul stench anywhere.

1> [+]= Emmett Gulley Obsesso Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by
1> The Second Sock.

1> I've never seen anyone so obsessed. You can't take two steps on
usenet
1> these days without tripping over a long and pointless thread
punctuated
1> by multiple of his socks and the name "derbyshire". :P And these
pop up
1> in the darndest of places. Besides eternal-september.support, in
1> rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, comp.lang.java programmer at minimum.
Not to
1> mention auk, though he seems to be posting here less of late -- I
wonder
1> why? >;-)

1> [-]= Goofy Azzed Baboon Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The
Second
1> Sock.

1> Nah. I've seen much more mangled language from, for instance,
ALIEN. Or
1> even tholen. He might have been a contender a couple years ago
during his
1> phlatArse phase, though, had he ever been nominated.

1> [+]= Order of the Holey Sockpuppet Award; Nominated by Ahnold;
Second by
1> The Second Sock.

1> Dweeb's changing nym sometimes two, three times a day now! And
keeping
1> several going at a time. "Hydra-Blanky" is currently the longest
lived in
1> use -- at a whole frigging WEEK of age.

1> And despite their youth, there's something ... dirty about each and
every
1> one of his socks.

1> Of course, his chief opponent, the "Murphy Foam Detoxification
Squad", is
1> probably a single person nymshifting, and if so is nymshifting just
as
1> much, but hey, he wasn't nominated and murphy was. >;-)

1> [+]= Unabomber Surprise Award; Nominated by Ahnold; Second by The
Second
1> Sock.

1> Textwall-a-day based on what I've seen. And now he's taken to
giant
1> screed-filled ranting sigs too, a sure sign he's begun his final
1> evolution into an Omega Kook of the same magnitude as Greegor and
Kent
1> Wills and all those others with a giant list of someone else's
alleged
1> crimes peppered with dozens of dubious weblinks for a sig.

1> Oh, what the hell.

1> [+]= Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award; Trainer of
Checkmate;
1> Nominated by Janithor; Second by javax.swing.JSnarker

1> [+]= Pavlov's Bell Lifetime Achievement Award; Nominated by Ahnold;
1> Second by The Second Sock.

1> That's one well-trained kook. All of Usenet should win the Barbara
1> Woodhouse jointly for training it, too.

1> [+]= Blistered Ass Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by The Second
Sock.

1> Uh-huh. Only because Arfatzio isn't up for this one, though.

1> [-]= Clueless Newbie Of The Month Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second
by
1> Janithor.

1> Must give Checkmate every chance here. Sorry, Dollar.

1> And now, for the pièce de résistance:

1> [+]= Pathetic Anal Pineapple Award; Nominated by FNVW; Second by
The
1> Second Sock, Janithor.

1> And how.

What does your ballot have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?  Maybe you
should nominate yourself for some award involving obsession with
an OS/2 newsgroup, Nadegda.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15891

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:56:58 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

> What does your ballot have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?  Maybe you should
> nominate yourself for some award involving obsession with an OS/2
> newsgroup, Nadegda.

That's an odd suggestion to make of someone who had just made her first 
ever post to an OS/2 newsgroup, tholen.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15892

Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:

3> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

3> That's an odd suggestion to make of someone who had just made her
first
3> ever post to an OS/2 newsgroup, tholen.

Classic illogic on your part, Nadegda, given that obsession can
manifest itself in the reading of a newsgroup as well.  And the
only way that someone could logically make the claim that I've
posted a response to "*every* *single* *article* in
comp.os.os2.advocacy" would be to read "*every* *single* *article* in
comp.os.os2.advocacy", Nadegda.  Of course, if you had really done
that, you'd know that your claim is quite false.  But hey, kooks
like you never let the truth get in the way of their obsession,
Nadegda.

Also, logically, in order to response to "*every* *single* *article*
in comp.os.os2.advocacy", it would be necessary to respond to my
own articles, Nadegda, which I also haven't done, so your claim
fails on more than one basis.  But hey, kooks like you never let
the truth get in the way of their obsession, Nadegda.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15893 — NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:15:50 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:
> 
> 3> Newsgroups:
> 
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer
> 
> 3> That's an odd suggestion to make of someone who had just made her
> first
> 3> ever post to an OS/2 newsgroup, tholen.
> 
> Classic illogic on your part, Nadegda, given that obsession can manifest
> itself in the reading of a newsgroup as well.

No such hypothetical obsession could manifest itself to someone thousands 
of miles away, because you can't see who's been lurking in your OS/2 
newsgroup or for how long, now, can you?

> And the only way that someone could logically make the claim that I've
> posted a response to "*every* *single* *article* in
> comp.os.os2.advocacy" would be to read "*every* *single* *article* in
> comp.os.os2.advocacy", Nadegda.

Or perhaps your reputation preceded you, sweetie. Ever think of that?

> Of course, if you had really done that, you'd know that your claim is
> quite false.  But hey, kooks like you never let the truth get in the
> way of their obsession, Nadegda.

Calling a kookologist a kook *again* nets you an immediate nomination for 
CNoTM. Enjoy!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15906 — Re: NOMINATION: Nadegda for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:

16> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

16> No such hypothetical obsession could manifest itself to someone
thousands
16> of miles away, because you can't see who's been lurking in your OS/
2
16> newsgroup or for how long, now, can you?

I can see your claim about "*every* *single* *article* in
comp.os.os2.advocacy", Nadegda, which is all I need.  And
on what basis do you claim to be thousands of miles away,
Nadegda?

16> Or perhaps your reputation preceded you,

Are you admitting to being gullible, Nadegda?  Making a claim based
on nothing more than somebody else's word, Nadegda?

16> sweetie.

Who is "sweetie", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.

16> Ever think of that?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?  Rather
ironic, coming from someone who didn't think about how somebody
else's word could be a lie!

16> Calling a kookologist a kook *again* nets you an immediate
nomination for
16> CNoTM. Enjoy!

Classic illogic on your part, Nadegda.  Ironically, your admission
about being "someone who had just made her first ever post to an
OS/2 newsgroup" qualifies you for being a newbie, and the fact that
you based your claim on somebody else's word qualifies you for being
clueless, Nadegda.  Then take a look at your subject line.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15915 — Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:52:34 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

> Followup-To: alt.test

That doesn't work. Give it up already. Followup lame DENIED, kook.

> Subject: NOMINATION: Nadegda for Clueless Newbie

Revenge nominations are looked dimly upon around these parts, kook.

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:
> 
> 16> Newsgroups:
> 
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer
> 
> 16> No such hypothetical obsession could manifest itself to someone
> thousands
> 16> of miles away, because you can't see who's been lurking in your OS/
> 2
> 16> newsgroup or for how long, now, can you?
> 
> I can see your claim about "*every* *single* *article* in
> comp.os.os2.advocacy", Nadegda, which is all I need.

What is it you like to say again? "Classic unsubstantiated and wrong 
claim"?

> And on what basis do you claim to be thousands of miles away, Nadegda?

On the basis that you're in Hawaii and I'm not?

> 16> Or perhaps your reputation preceded you,
> 
> Are you admitting to being gullible, Nadegda?  Making a claim based on
> nothing more than somebody else's word, Nadegda?

Not at all, tholo-kook. I'm making a claim based on *many* people's words 
*and* my own observation of your recent posting history, which seems to 
include responses to practically *every* post to cooa not by you, kook.

> 16> sweetie.
> 
> Who is "sweetie", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
> alias.

<rolls eyes>

> 16> Ever think of that?
> 
> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?  Rather ironic,
> coming from someone who didn't think about how somebody else's word
> could be a lie!

Could be, but apparently wasn't, kookie darling.

> 16> Calling a kookologist a kook *again* nets you an immediate
> nomination for
> 16> CNoTM. Enjoy!
> 
> Classic illogic on your part, Nadegda.

No, you thinking your revenge nomination would pass the laugh test was 
classic illogic, kook. A smart kook would have waited a week or two and 
then nominated me via some sock not obviously traceable back to 
"tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu", dumb kook. A smart kook would also have had at 
least *some* tissue of justification for claiming clueless newbish 
behavior on my part, dumb kook.

> Ironically, your admission about being "someone who had just made her
> first ever post to an OS/2 newsgroup" qualifies you for being a newbie,

I've been around usenet for literally decades, you ridiculously stupid 
machine. As would be apparent if you actually read and understood my 
posts the way a human would, rather than merely parsing them and applying 
a few reg.exp. substitution rules, twitbot. Which makes your fairly 
frequent condescending question "Suffering from reading comprehension 
problems?" rather ironic, wouldn't you say, kook?

> and the fact that you based your claim on somebody else's word
> qualifies you for being clueless, Nadegda.  Then take a look at your
> subject line.

But I didn't base my claim *only* on somebody else's word, as I have now 
elaborated, kook. So at even creating the thinnest tissue of 
justification, you earn a giant FAIL, and so does whoever programmed you, 
robo-kook.

Er, Phoenix, point of order: is nominating a machine for a kook award 
valid, given that it a) makes automated usenet posts that b) are kooky 
but c) do not pass a Turing test? Or do I need to change the nom to 
nominate the John Doe programmer of the tholenkookbot instead of the bot 
itself?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15916 — Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:

24> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

24> That doesn't work.

What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to
do with OS/2, Nadegda?

24> Give it up already.

What does your demand have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

24> Followup lame DENIED, kook.

Who is "kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias, though dizzy uses it as a signature line
from time to time.

24> Revenge nominations are looked dimly upon around these parts,
kook.

Who is "kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias, though dizzy uses it as a signature line
from time to time.

24> What is it you like to say again? "Classic unsubstantiated and
wrong
24> claim"?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

24> On the basis that you're in Hawaii and I'm not?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

24> Not at all, tholo-kook.

Who is "tholo-kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

24> I'm making a claim based on *many* people's words
24> *and* my own observation of your recent posting history, which
seems to
24> include responses to practically *every* post to cooa not by you,
kook.

Who is "kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias, though dizzy uses it as a signature line
from time to time.

24> <rolls eyes>

What does your eye rolling have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

24> Could be, but apparently wasn't, kookie darling.

Who is "kookie darling", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

24> No, you thinking your revenge nomination would pass the laugh test
was
24> classic illogic, kook.

Who is "kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias, though dizzy uses it as a signature line
from time to time.

24> A smart kook would have waited a week or two and
24> then nominated me via some sock not obviously traceable back to
24> "tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu", dumb kook.

Who is "dumb kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

24> A smart kook would also have had at
24> least *some* tissue of justification for claiming clueless
newbish
24> behavior on my part, dumb kook.

Who is "dumb kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

24> I've been around usenet for literally decades, you ridiculously
stupid
24> machine.

Who is "your ridiculously stupid machine", Nadegda?  There is
nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.

24> As would be apparent if you actually read and understood my
24> posts the way a human would, rather than merely parsing them and
applying
24> a few reg.exp. substitution rules, twitbot.

Who is "twitbot", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

24> Which makes your fairly
24> frequent condescending question "Suffering from reading
comprehension
24> problems?" rather ironic, wouldn't you say, kook?

Who is "kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias, though dizzy uses it as a signature line
from time to time.

24> But I didn't base my claim *only* on somebody else's word, as I
have now
24> elaborated, kook.

Who is "kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias, though dizzy uses it as a signature line
from time to time.

24> So at even creating the thinnest tissue of
24> justification, you earn a giant FAIL, and so does whoever
programmed you,
24> robo-kook.

Who is "robo-kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

24> Er, Phoenix, point of order: is nominating a machine for a kook
award
24> valid, given that it a) makes automated usenet posts that b) are
kooky
24> but c) do not pass a Turing test? Or do I need to change the nom
to
24> nominate the John Doe programmer of the tholenkookbot instead of
the bot
24> itself?

What do your questions have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?  And do you
often engage in conversations with what you believe are machines,
Nadegda?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15917 — Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:00:36 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:
> 
> 24> Newsgroups:
> 
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer
> 
> 24> That doesn't work.
> 
> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> with OS/2, Nadegda?

Tee hee.

And yet here I am, instead of over in alt.test -- how do you explain 
that, hmm?

> 24> I've been around usenet for literally decades, you ridiculously
> stupid
> 24> machine.
> 
> Who is "your ridiculously stupid machine", Nadegda?  There is nobody in
> this newsgroup using that alias.

<rolls eyes>

> 24> Er, Phoenix, point of order: is nominating a machine for a kook
> award
> 24> valid, given that it a) makes automated usenet posts that b) are
> kooky
> 24> but c) do not pass a Turing test? Or do I need to change the nom to
> 24> nominate the John Doe programmer of the tholenkookbot instead of the
> bot
> 24> itself?
> 
> What do your questions have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?  And do you often
> engage in conversations with what you believe are machines, Nadegda?

There is always a possibility that your owner is looking over your 
shoulder or reading your logfiles or the newsgroup, robokook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15928 — Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:

25> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

25> Tee hee.

What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

25> And yet here I am, instead of over in alt.test -- how do you
explain
25> that, hmm?

Simple:  you put "here" in the Newsgroups line, Nadegda, despite
having nothing to say about OS/2.

25> <rolls eyes>

What does your eye rolling have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

25> There is always a possibility that your owner is looking over
your
25> shoulder or reading your logfiles or the newsgroup, robokook.

Who is "robokook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.  And what does your paranoia have to do with
OS/2, Nadegda?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15930 — Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:41:53 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:
> 
> 25> And yet here I am, instead of over in alt.test -- how do you explain
> 25> that, hmm?
> 
> Simple:  you put "here" in the Newsgroups line, Nadegda, despite having
> nothing to say about OS/2.

Your evasion of my point that your followup-to redirection trick isn't 
working is noted, kook.

> 25> There is always a possibility that your owner is looking over your
> 25> shoulder or reading your logfiles or the newsgroup, robokook.
> 
> Who is "robokook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
> that alias.  And what does your paranoia have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

*My* paranoia?

<titters>

How is the possibility of someone looking over *your* shoulder in any way 
*my* paranoia, sweet-cheeks?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15937 — Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:

29> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer

29> Your evasion of my point that your followup-to redirection trick
isn't
29> working is noted, kook.

Who is "kook", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias, though dizzy uses it as a signature line
from time to time.

29> *My* paranoia?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

29> <titters>

What does your tittering have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?

29> How is the possibility of someone looking over *your* shoulder in
any way
29> *my* paranoia, sweet-cheeks?

Who is "sweet-cheeks", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web