Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15915
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks, rec.arts.tv, comp.os.os2.advocacy, comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) |
| Followup-To | alt.usenet.kooks |
| Date | 2012-07-10 12:21 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jth6nq$h9q$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <25ec8fb2-ab2c-451d-ba70-3583626f736c@m2g2000pbv.googlegroups.com> <jtee1o$a7f$2@dont-email.me> <66c02d32-2129-4a7a-987a-cce28a4fd183@l6g2000pbf.googlegroups.com> <jteerj$a7f$5@dont-email.me> <8361849f-67df-420d-972f-9ab168e972f9@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: alt.usenet.kooks
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:52:34 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > Followup-To: alt.test That doesn't work. Give it up already. Followup lame DENIED, kook. > Subject: NOMINATION: Nadegda for Clueless Newbie Revenge nominations are looked dimly upon around these parts, kook. > Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes: > > 16> Newsgroups: > alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer > > 16> No such hypothetical obsession could manifest itself to someone > thousands > 16> of miles away, because you can't see who's been lurking in your OS/ > 2 > 16> newsgroup or for how long, now, can you? > > I can see your claim about "*every* *single* *article* in > comp.os.os2.advocacy", Nadegda, which is all I need. What is it you like to say again? "Classic unsubstantiated and wrong claim"? > And on what basis do you claim to be thousands of miles away, Nadegda? On the basis that you're in Hawaii and I'm not? > 16> Or perhaps your reputation preceded you, > > Are you admitting to being gullible, Nadegda? Making a claim based on > nothing more than somebody else's word, Nadegda? Not at all, tholo-kook. I'm making a claim based on *many* people's words *and* my own observation of your recent posting history, which seems to include responses to practically *every* post to cooa not by you, kook. > 16> sweetie. > > Who is "sweetie", Nadegda? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that > alias. <rolls eyes> > 16> Ever think of that? > > What does your question have to do with OS/2, Nadegda? Rather ironic, > coming from someone who didn't think about how somebody else's word > could be a lie! Could be, but apparently wasn't, kookie darling. > 16> Calling a kookologist a kook *again* nets you an immediate > nomination for > 16> CNoTM. Enjoy! > > Classic illogic on your part, Nadegda. No, you thinking your revenge nomination would pass the laugh test was classic illogic, kook. A smart kook would have waited a week or two and then nominated me via some sock not obviously traceable back to "tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu", dumb kook. A smart kook would also have had at least *some* tissue of justification for claiming clueless newbish behavior on my part, dumb kook. > Ironically, your admission about being "someone who had just made her > first ever post to an OS/2 newsgroup" qualifies you for being a newbie, I've been around usenet for literally decades, you ridiculously stupid machine. As would be apparent if you actually read and understood my posts the way a human would, rather than merely parsing them and applying a few reg.exp. substitution rules, twitbot. Which makes your fairly frequent condescending question "Suffering from reading comprehension problems?" rather ironic, wouldn't you say, kook? > and the fact that you based your claim on somebody else's word > qualifies you for being clueless, Nadegda. Then take a look at your > subject line. But I didn't base my claim *only* on somebody else's word, as I have now elaborated, kook. So at even creating the thinnest tissue of justification, you earn a giant FAIL, and so does whoever programmed you, robo-kook. Er, Phoenix, point of order: is nominating a machine for a kook award valid, given that it a) makes automated usenet posts that b) are kooky but c) do not pass a Turing test? Or do I need to change the nom to nominate the John Doe programmer of the tholenkookbot instead of the bot itself?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 07:50 +0000
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 03:05 -0700
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 03:59 -0700
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 04:28 -0700
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 16:53 -0700
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 03:56 -0700
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 11:07 +0000
Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 04:15 -0700
NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 11:21 +0000
Re: NOMINATION: Nadegda for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 16:52 -0700
Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 12:21 +0000
Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-10 06:00 -0700
Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 13:47 +0000
Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-10 13:41 -0700
Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 21:50 +0000
Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-11 05:46 -0700
csiph-web