Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15915

Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)

From Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.usenet.kooks, rec.arts.tv, comp.os.os2.advocacy, comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)
Followup-To alt.usenet.kooks
Date 2012-07-10 12:21 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jth6nq$h9q$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <25ec8fb2-ab2c-451d-ba70-3583626f736c@m2g2000pbv.googlegroups.com> <jtee1o$a7f$2@dont-email.me> <66c02d32-2129-4a7a-987a-cce28a4fd183@l6g2000pbf.googlegroups.com> <jteerj$a7f$5@dont-email.me> <8361849f-67df-420d-972f-9ab168e972f9@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.usenet.kooks

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:52:34 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

> Followup-To: alt.test

That doesn't work. Give it up already. Followup lame DENIED, kook.

> Subject: NOMINATION: Nadegda for Clueless Newbie

Revenge nominations are looked dimly upon around these parts, kook.

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:
> 
> 16> Newsgroups:
> 
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer
> 
> 16> No such hypothetical obsession could manifest itself to someone
> thousands
> 16> of miles away, because you can't see who's been lurking in your OS/
> 2
> 16> newsgroup or for how long, now, can you?
> 
> I can see your claim about "*every* *single* *article* in
> comp.os.os2.advocacy", Nadegda, which is all I need.

What is it you like to say again? "Classic unsubstantiated and wrong 
claim"?

> And on what basis do you claim to be thousands of miles away, Nadegda?

On the basis that you're in Hawaii and I'm not?

> 16> Or perhaps your reputation preceded you,
> 
> Are you admitting to being gullible, Nadegda?  Making a claim based on
> nothing more than somebody else's word, Nadegda?

Not at all, tholo-kook. I'm making a claim based on *many* people's words 
*and* my own observation of your recent posting history, which seems to 
include responses to practically *every* post to cooa not by you, kook.

> 16> sweetie.
> 
> Who is "sweetie", Nadegda?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
> alias.

<rolls eyes>

> 16> Ever think of that?
> 
> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Nadegda?  Rather ironic,
> coming from someone who didn't think about how somebody else's word
> could be a lie!

Could be, but apparently wasn't, kookie darling.

> 16> Calling a kookologist a kook *again* nets you an immediate
> nomination for
> 16> CNoTM. Enjoy!
> 
> Classic illogic on your part, Nadegda.

No, you thinking your revenge nomination would pass the laugh test was 
classic illogic, kook. A smart kook would have waited a week or two and 
then nominated me via some sock not obviously traceable back to 
"tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu", dumb kook. A smart kook would also have had at 
least *some* tissue of justification for claiming clueless newbish 
behavior on my part, dumb kook.

> Ironically, your admission about being "someone who had just made her
> first ever post to an OS/2 newsgroup" qualifies you for being a newbie,

I've been around usenet for literally decades, you ridiculously stupid 
machine. As would be apparent if you actually read and understood my 
posts the way a human would, rather than merely parsing them and applying 
a few reg.exp. substitution rules, twitbot. Which makes your fairly 
frequent condescending question "Suffering from reading comprehension 
problems?" rather ironic, wouldn't you say, kook?

> and the fact that you based your claim on somebody else's word
> qualifies you for being clueless, Nadegda.  Then take a look at your
> subject line.

But I didn't base my claim *only* on somebody else's word, as I have now 
elaborated, kook. So at even creating the thinnest tissue of 
justification, you earn a giant FAIL, and so does whoever programmed you, 
robo-kook.

Er, Phoenix, point of order: is nominating a machine for a kook award 
valid, given that it a) makes automated usenet posts that b) are kooky 
but c) do not pass a Turing test? Or do I need to change the nom to 
nominate the John Doe programmer of the tholenkookbot instead of the bot 
itself?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 07:50 +0000
  Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 03:05 -0700
    Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 03:59 -0700
      Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 04:28 -0700
        Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 16:53 -0700
  Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 03:56 -0700
    Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 11:07 +0000
      Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 04:15 -0700
        NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-09 11:21 +0000
          Re: NOMINATION: Nadegda for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-09 16:52 -0700
            Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 12:21 +0000
              Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-10 06:00 -0700
                Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 13:47 +0000
                Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-10 13:41 -0700
                Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-07-10 21:50 +0000
                Re: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2012-07-11 05:46 -0700

csiph-web