Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17350
| From | David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? |
| Date | 2012-08-08 09:44 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jvtqg2$25d$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <jvrml4$ph4$1@dont-email.me> <023d634e-8bea-421f-a598-0bb668d44d38@googlegroups.com> |
On 07/08/2012 4:47 PM, Lew wrote: > On Tuesday, August 7, 2012 11:26:41 AM UTC-7, David Lamb wrote: >> Does anyone have data, or at least an informed opinion, on how often >> genuine users of a proposed piece of software get consulted on >> developing use cases (or some close equivalent)? I ask here because of >> the recent UML discussion and because I've seen people, especially Lew, >> mention use cases reasonably frequently. > > I mention use cases in a rather abstract sense, that is, to signify the underlying > phenomenon of a collection of circumstances and needs. You seem to use the > term in a more restricted sense of the documentation of such phenomena. Not really, which is why I said "or close equivalent." I should probably have expanded a bit to say some reasonably precise description of user requirements in a reasonably user-comprehensible form. >> anyone know which of us is closer to right? Is the answer different for >> the Java and object-oriented-development community than it is for other >> developers? > > Those questions require data. I know, which is why in the opening paragraph I asked if anyone had data and, if not, falling back on informed opinons -- which you gave me later in your response. Thanks! and thanks to everyone else who is responding -- I'm waiting to see how the conversation plays out before saying much more than I have already (except I plan to clarify what I meant whenever it becomes apparent I left out important details). In any case the data I was hoping for was on practices, not motivations -- my colleague's expression was to me a hyperbolic version of "they don't ask the actual users."
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-08-07 14:26 -0400
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-07 22:13 +0200
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-07 13:47 -0700
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-07 14:23 -0700
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-07 14:54 -0700
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-08-08 09:47 -0400
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-08 09:48 -0700
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-12 22:57 -0400
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-08-08 09:44 -0400
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-12 22:53 -0400
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2012-08-08 11:41 +0300
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-12 22:48 -0400
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-08-13 05:32 -0500
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-14 12:35 -0700
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-08-14 15:35 -0500
Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-15 09:32 -0700
csiph-web