Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14833

Re: Proposed new Java feature

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Proposed new Java feature
Date Sun, 27 May 2012 11:00:41 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 44
Message-ID <jptq42$1jo$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <jprnu7$uv8$1@dont-email.me> <jptkmp$vbg$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date Sun, 27 May 2012 18:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="P5j3IZ/M0ehOxHRbp7DrKw"; logging-data="1656"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18J0rNaq6XXk+vShZuTexSlldinGISmnl8="
X-MimeOLE Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-RFC2646 Format=Flowed; Response
X-Newsreader Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Cancel-Lock sha1:CWH78fkWdw4tQPXGxsBeQptH0lM=
X-Priority 3
X-MSMail-Priority Normal
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14833

Show key headers only | View raw


"markspace" <-@.> wrote in message news:jptkmp$vbg$1@dont-email.me...
> On 5/26/2012 4:11 PM, Mike Schilling wrote:
>
>> Proposed feature: a static method on Thread that clears all ThreadLocals 
>> for
>> the current thread.
>>
>
>
> I can see your points.  However, I don't have any real experience with 
> ThreadLocal, and when a neophyte agrees with your argument, that's a red 
> flag.
>
> Here's a blog where someone seems to have the same issue as you.
>
> <http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jjviana/archive/2010/06/10/threadlocal-thread-pool-bad-idea-or-dealing-apparent-glassfish-memor>
>
> At the end of the comments, there's a suggestion to use 
> ThreadLocal::remove(), with the implication that it allows the thread 
> local variable to be garbage collection.  Is there a reason that doesn't 
> work for you?

That acts on an individual ThreadLocal (and works quite well), but it 
doens't allow removing all ThreadLocals that might have been accumlated.

>
> My other thought is that "for the current thread" could be improved with 
> "for a given thread."  So, inside an Executor, I can just call
>
>   Thread t = ...
>   // .. use the thread ..
>   Thread.removeLocals( t );
>   // now add the thread back into the pool...
>
> And this seems better because I don't have to rely on the users of a 
> thread remembering to do it themselves.  External control seems better 
> here.
>

Same comment.  What I'm asking for is Thread.removeLocals(), which doesn't 
currently exist.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-26 16:11 -0700
  Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-27 13:32 +0200
    Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:14 -0700
      Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
      Re: Proposed new Java feature v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2012-06-04 20:16 +0000
  Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 09:28 -0700
    Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:00 -0700
      Re: Proposed new Java feature Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-27 11:46 -0700
        Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:04 -0700
          Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 15:30 -0400
            Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:59 -0700
              Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 17:51 -0400
                Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 15:20 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 08:28 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 19:29 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 12:16 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 22:58 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-28 21:40 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-29 22:52 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-29 18:53 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 23:27 +0100
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:22 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 21:43 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2012-05-29 14:32 +0000
  Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 18:43 +0100
  Re: Proposed new Java feature Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2012-06-02 12:41 -0700
    Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-02 15:55 -0700

csiph-web