Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14834
| From | "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Proposed new Java feature |
| Date | 2012-05-27 11:14 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jptqtm$68p$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <jprnu7$uv8$1@dont-email.me> <a2ehm0Fee8U1@mid.individual.net> |
"Robert Klemme" <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:a2ehm0Fee8U1@mid.individual.net... >> 2. ThreadLocals interact badly with ThreadPools, because the ThreadLocals >> keep their value when the tyhread is put back into the pool. This can >> lead >> to leaks and even potential security issues. > > I would actually consider this good interaction with thread pools: the > local stays around for as long as the thread lives. If you introduce > security issues this way than you are probably not using thread locals > properly. There are two things that you generally need to consider with > thread locals which both result from the fact that the life time of a > thread local value extends across a current method call (i.e. earlier and > later): OK. Now, coinsider these two cases (for, say, a webserver): 1. I create a new thread to handle each new request. 2. I optimize (1) by using a thread pool to minimize thread creation. I want those two to behave identically (other than performance). To acheive that, I need to be able to kill all the ThreadLocals when putting the Threads back into the pool for later reuse. Otherwise A. The ThreadLocals for threads in the pool cause packratting. B. A reused thread contains context created during its previous use. This may be context that the user correspnding to the request currently being handled by the thread should not be able to see.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-26 16:11 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-27 13:32 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:14 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2012-06-04 20:16 +0000
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 09:28 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:00 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-27 11:46 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:04 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 15:30 -0400
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:59 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 17:51 -0400
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 15:20 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 08:28 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 12:16 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 22:58 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-28 21:40 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-29 22:52 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-29 18:53 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 23:27 +0100
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:22 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 21:43 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2012-05-29 14:32 +0000
Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 18:43 +0100
Re: Proposed new Java feature Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2012-06-02 12:41 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-02 15:55 -0700
csiph-web