Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15011
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Proposed new Java feature |
| Date | 2012-06-02 15:55 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jqe5lc$1tu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <jprnu7$uv8$1@dont-email.me> <4fca6c4f$0$35595$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> |
On 6/2/2012 12:41 PM, Kevin McMurtrie wrote: > Forcing the ThreadLocals out of a Thread would be bad. There's still > too much crap code floating around that uses ThreadLocal for parameter > passing. Just because there's "crap out there" doesn't mean a new feature isn't useful or a good idea. No one requires you to call "removeLocals" or whatever method in your code. Obviously, no "crap out there" currently calls such a method, unless you're willing to muck with reflection. So what harm does adding something useful do? That someone *might* use it inappropriately? Come on, that describes every single method in the Java API.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-26 16:11 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-27 13:32 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:14 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2012-06-04 20:16 +0000
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 09:28 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:00 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-27 11:46 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:04 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 15:30 -0400
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:59 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 17:51 -0400
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 15:20 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 08:28 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 12:16 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 22:58 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-28 21:40 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-29 22:52 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-29 18:53 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 23:27 +0100
Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:22 +0200
Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 21:43 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2012-05-29 14:32 +0000
Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 18:43 +0100
Re: Proposed new Java feature Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2012-06-02 12:41 -0700
Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-02 15:55 -0700
csiph-web