Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14840

Re: Proposed new Java feature

From Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Proposed new Java feature
Date 2012-05-27 17:51 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jpu7m3$k7e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <jptq42$1jo$1@dont-email.me> <8Euwr.47425$On2.20024@newsfe16.iad> <jpttrh$nqe$1@dont-email.me> <jptvdf$1s5$1@dont-email.me> <jpu11t$c79$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/27/2012 3:59 PM, Mike Schilling wrote:
> "Eric Sosman"<esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid>  wrote in message
> news:jptvdf$1s5$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 5/27/2012 3:04 PM, Mike Schilling wrote:
>>> "Daniel Pitts"<newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net>   wrote in message
>>> news:8Euwr.47425$On2.20024@newsfe16.iad...
>>>> On 5/27/12 11:00 AM, Mike Schilling wrote:
>>>>> "markspace"<-@.>    wrote in message news:jptkmp$vbg$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> On 5/26/2012 4:11 PM, Mike Schilling wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Proposed feature: a static method on Thread that clears all
>>>>>>> ThreadLocals
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> the current thread.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can see your points.  However, I don't have any real experience with
>>>>>> ThreadLocal, and when a neophyte agrees with your argument, that's a
>>>>>> red
>>>>>> flag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a blog where someone seems to have the same issue as you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jjviana/archive/2010/06/10/threadlocal-thread-pool-bad-idea-or-dealing-apparent-glassfish-memor>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the end of the comments, there's a suggestion to use
>>>>>> ThreadLocal::remove(), with the implication that it allows the thread
>>>>>> local variable to be garbage collection.  Is there a reason that
>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>> work for you?
>>>>>
>>>>> That acts on an individual ThreadLocal (and works quite well), but it
>>>>> doens't allow removing all ThreadLocals that might have been
>>>>> accumlated.
>>>> You're basically saying "This type of resource can leak if not cleared
>>>> appropriately, so there should be a 'Release all resources' method."
>>>>
>>>> When paraphrased that way, does that make it clearer why it isn't a good
>>>> idea? It would be about the same as a "File.closeAll()" or a
>>>> "Socket.closeAll()" call.  Extremely dangerous and only a crutch for not
>>>> doing the right thing to begin with.
>>>
>>> Or a "collect all unused memory" call . Clearly, that's a crutch for not
>>> keeping track of memory allocation properly in the first place.  And the
>>> fact that files and sockets are closed when a process exits is yet
>>> another
>>> crutch.
>>
>>      I'm with Daniel.  Your code uses classes that you wrote, and
>> classes you got from somewhere else -- Sioux Unusuals, perhaps.
>> And if those classes use ThreadLocals for their own purposes, and
>> you blithely destroy them all, what happens then?  Or what about
>> the class that invoked your code, passing an InheritableThreadLocal?
>> Is it a good idea to change parts of your invoker's state that you
>> don't understand, that you aren't even aware of?
>
> Consider the use case again.

     I understood it fine the first time around, thanks.  If you
think of anything new to add, pray do so.

> [... reiteration of old material ...]

     I notice that you do not address any of the issues Daniel or I
raised; you just repeat what you "want."  I know three-year-olds
who can do that, but I don't rush to grant their every whim.

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-26 16:11 -0700
  Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-27 13:32 +0200
    Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:14 -0700
      Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
      Re: Proposed new Java feature v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2012-06-04 20:16 +0000
  Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 09:28 -0700
    Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 11:00 -0700
      Re: Proposed new Java feature Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-27 11:46 -0700
        Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:04 -0700
          Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 15:30 -0400
            Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 12:59 -0700
              Re: Proposed new Java feature Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 17:51 -0400
                Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-27 15:20 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:13 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 08:28 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 19:29 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-28 12:16 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 22:58 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-28 21:40 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-29 22:52 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-29 18:53 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 23:27 +0100
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:22 +0200
                Re: Proposed new Java feature "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 21:43 -0700
                Re: Proposed new Java feature Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2012-05-29 14:32 +0000
  Re: Proposed new Java feature Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2012-05-27 18:43 +0100
  Re: Proposed new Java feature Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2012-06-02 12:41 -0700
    Re: Proposed new Java feature markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-02 15:55 -0700

csiph-web