Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10674

Re: Volatile keyword

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Volatile keyword
Date Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:00:09 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 19
Message-ID <jc5ffc$28s$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <41fa02ff-3f20-41bc-90d9-c3f7d3651fbf@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:00:12 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="2332"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dLr9rtsdz8hHVWDlrWpg80QJwW2WxsDY="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To <41fa02ff-3f20-41bc-90d9-c3f7d3651fbf@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:DHGJx2fusV6SnERGvGx9HhtQ+Eo=
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10674

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12/12/2011 4:51 AM, raphfrk@gmail.com wrote:

> Effectively, does the CPU lock the entire 64-bits for the long when
> doing the write update, and so other threads either seen the updated
> value or the old value?


I don't like the word "lock" here because it implies something that 
probably isn't happening.  I think that volatile, even for long and 
double, is specified to be much lighter weight than a lock.

The spec that Lew referred to says they are "atomic" and doesn't mention 
"lock."  I think of them that way, myself, in addition to "light weight" 
as opposed to the more heavy actual lock.

volatile long === light weight & atomic.

(=== here meant to mean "defined to be.")

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Volatile keyword "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 04:51 -0800
  Re: Volatile keyword Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-12 14:31 +0000
    Re: Volatile keyword "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 06:52 -0800
  Re: Volatile keyword Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 06:34 -0800
  Re: Volatile keyword markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-12 10:00 -0800
    Re: Volatile keyword Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-12 18:41 +0000
      Re: Volatile keyword Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-12 11:43 -0800
    Re: Volatile keyword Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 11:15 -0800
      Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-13 08:37 +0100
        Re: Volatile keyword Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-12-12 23:54 -0800
          Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-14 19:39 +0100
            Re: Volatile keyword Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-14 10:59 -0800
            Re: Volatile keyword Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-14 11:00 -0800
              Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-14 22:35 +0100
  Re: Volatile keyword Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 10:55 -0800

csiph-web