Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10666
| From | "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Volatile keyword |
| Date | 2011-12-12 04:51 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <41fa02ff-3f20-41bc-90d9-c3f7d3651fbf@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
Does this make all read/writes happen in full. For example, if one thread had volatile long a = 0xFFFFFFFF00000000L; <do stuff> a = ~a; If another thread read a, would it always give 0xFFFFFFFF00000000 or 0x00000000FFFFFFFF and not partial writes (say it updates 32 bits and then the next 32 bits). I understand that if two threads do a++, it might only increment twice, if they both read the old value at the same time. Effectively, does the CPU lock the entire 64-bits for the long when doing the write update, and so other threads either seen the updated value or the old value?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Volatile keyword "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 04:51 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-12 14:31 +0000
Re: Volatile keyword "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 06:52 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 06:34 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-12 10:00 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-12 18:41 +0000
Re: Volatile keyword Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-12 11:43 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 11:15 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-13 08:37 +0100
Re: Volatile keyword Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-12-12 23:54 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-14 19:39 +0100
Re: Volatile keyword Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-14 10:59 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-14 11:00 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-14 22:35 +0100
Re: Volatile keyword Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 10:55 -0800
csiph-web