Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10669
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Volatile keyword |
| Date | 2011-12-12 06:34 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <22507025.2260.1323700458271.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prcx11> (permalink) |
| References | <41fa02ff-3f20-41bc-90d9-c3f7d3651fbf@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> |
On Monday, December 12, 2011 4:51:41 AM UTC-8, rap...@gmail.com wrote: > Does this make all read/writes happen in full. > > For example, if one thread had > > volatile long a = 0xFFFFFFFF00000000L; > > <do stuff> > > a = ~a; > > If another thread read a, would it always give 0xFFFFFFFF00000000 or > 0x00000000FFFFFFFF and not partial writes (say it updates 32 bits and > then the next 32 bits). > > I understand that if two threads do a++, it might only increment > twice, if they both read the old value at the same time. > > Effectively, does the CPU lock the entire 64-bits for the long when > doing the write update, and so other threads either seen the updated > value or the old value? http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/memory.html#17.4 http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/memory.html#17.7 http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#8.3.1.4 -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Volatile keyword "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 04:51 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-12 14:31 +0000
Re: Volatile keyword "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 06:52 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 06:34 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-12 10:00 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-12 18:41 +0000
Re: Volatile keyword Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-12 11:43 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 11:15 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-13 08:37 +0100
Re: Volatile keyword Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-12-12 23:54 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-14 19:39 +0100
Re: Volatile keyword Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-14 10:59 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-14 11:00 -0800
Re: Volatile keyword Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-14 22:35 +0100
Re: Volatile keyword Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 10:55 -0800
csiph-web