Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10013
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | markspace <-@.> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy |
| Date | Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:32:54 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 33 |
| Message-ID | <ja3k0o$9jv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <61e17074-e229-4303-a549-2389ccf502d3@m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <im8ac7t9bge5464b2aesgsnqd6qmf553c8@4ax.com> <4njac7ttrpfca17vtgcesuq9buli0hgls3@4ax.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:32:56 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="9855"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18GbnbSmuUzOj/nM3UiZsdnSgcdUKjDJqs=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <4njac7ttrpfca17vtgcesuq9buli0hgls3@4ax.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:7ISegWuRZAHIbwuOv+ftsOGbQUk= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10013 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 11/17/2011 10:25 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> written was something like:
> if (cParsedWord=="$define")
> Instead, I had to write:
> if (cParsedWord.equals("$define"))
> Without that method, it was something like:
> if (cParsedWord.Value.toString().equals("$define"))
In all honesty, I prefer the last one. At least I can see what is going
on, and I don't think it is long at all. There are plenty of good
examples where Java is verbose. This isn't one of them.
And overriding "equals" in this way is pernicious.
[[Snipped a lot of very nasty source code]]
> void Set
> (
> String theString
> )
> {
> this.Value.replace(0,this.Value.length(),theString);
> }
> }
>
> Death by a thousand cuts.
If you're referring to whomever invented that source formatting style,
then yeah, it's grody. But that's not Java's fault.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-16 00:41 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-17 07:16 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 09:28 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-18 08:16 +0000
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-18 02:32 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-18 07:35 -0400
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:23 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-17 10:25 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-17 10:32 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-17 11:02 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-19 11:49 +0100
csiph-web