Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10013

Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy

From markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy
Date 2011-11-17 10:32 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ja3k0o$9jv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <61e17074-e229-4303-a549-2389ccf502d3@m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <im8ac7t9bge5464b2aesgsnqd6qmf553c8@4ax.com> <4njac7ttrpfca17vtgcesuq9buli0hgls3@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/17/2011 10:25 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> written was something like:
>            if (cParsedWord=="$define")
> Instead, I had to write:
>            if (cParsedWord.equals("$define"))
> Without that method, it was something like:
>            if (cParsedWord.Value.toString().equals("$define"))


In all honesty, I prefer the last one.  At least I can see what is going 
on, and I don't think it is long at all.  There are plenty of good 
examples where Java is verbose.  This isn't one of them.

And overriding "equals" in this way is pernicious.


[[Snipped a lot of very nasty source code]]
>     void Set
>      (
>      String theString
>      )
>        {
>        this.Value.replace(0,this.Value.length(),theString);
>        }
>     }

>
>       Death by a thousand cuts.


If you're referring to whomever invented that source formatting style, 
then yeah, it's grody.  But that's not Java's fault.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-16 00:41 -0800
  Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-17 07:16 -0800
    Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 09:28 -0800
      Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-18 08:16 +0000
      Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-18 02:32 -0800
        Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-18 07:35 -0400
        Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:23 -0800
    Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-17 10:25 -0800
      Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-17 10:32 -0800
        Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-17 11:02 -0800
  Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-19 11:49 +0100

csiph-web