Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10014
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy |
| Date | 2011-11-17 11:02 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <agmac7do881omd5af4mj7itrkmg10o6hav@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <61e17074-e229-4303-a549-2389ccf502d3@m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <im8ac7t9bge5464b2aesgsnqd6qmf553c8@4ax.com> <4njac7ttrpfca17vtgcesuq9buli0hgls3@4ax.com> <ja3k0o$9jv$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:32:54 -0800, markspace <-@.> wrote:
>On 11/17/2011 10:25 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>> written was something like:
>> if (cParsedWord=="$define")
>> Instead, I had to write:
>> if (cParsedWord.equals("$define"))
>> Without that method, it was something like:
>> if (cParsedWord.Value.toString().equals("$define"))
>In all honesty, I prefer the last one. At least I can see what is going
>on, and I don't think it is long at all. There are plenty of good
>examples where Java is verbose. This isn't one of them.
Um, the condition is twice the length of other languages'
equivalents.
>And overriding "equals" in this way is pernicious.
Why? I was checking for equality.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-16 00:41 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-17 07:16 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 09:28 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-18 08:16 +0000
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-18 02:32 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-18 07:35 -0400
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:23 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-17 10:25 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-17 10:32 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-17 11:02 -0800
Re: Static type checking: hybrid mode in Groovy Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-19 11:49 +0100
csiph-web