Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4542
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: analysis of java application logs |
| Date | Tue, 24 May 2011 19:12:43 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <irgou8$2sk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <bd933ace-5641-4711-9105-4e949a602b87@c1g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <irdmdc$hfg$1@news.albasani.net> <ire4op$fgq$1@dont-email.me> <ireave$1m2$1@news.albasani.net> <iremt2$u3k$1@localhost.localdomain> <941ivgF1amU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 24 May 2011 17:12:40 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="wuHO4+AmBlRL2H3W7qDweA"; logging-data="2964"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kYyUy4Fu/hgc08QI+BRpw" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| In-Reply-To | <941ivgF1amU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:+MM1CFeQvcqercSO4Pf5ACsmFQI= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4542 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 24/05/2011 13:26, Nigel Wade allegedly wrote:
> On 23/05/11 23:25, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> I tend to use at least two logging streams: debugging and
>> operational. I leave debugging statements in production code: its
>> normally off (of course) but can be turned on if needed.
>
> There is one caveat to leaving debug logging in production code; it
> may affect performance. Even with output disabled the string
> arguments are still constructed, unless they are constant. If logging
> is located in a tight loop, or critical section, it might become
> significant.
>
> In one particular application I profiled I found this to be eating
> up 80% of the CPU time. Admittedly, this was a rather special case,
> but it's still something which ought to be borne in mind if you leave
> debug logging code in production software.
>
Use a print-eff'ing logger and you'll have next to no overhead. If
evaluating the arguments is too heavy, use the ugly
if( logger.isXXXEnabled() ){}
jump.
--
DF.
An escaped convict once said to me:
"Alcatraz is the place to be"
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
analysis of java application logs Ulrich Scholz <d7@thispla.net> - 2011-05-23 00:50 -0700
Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 02:20 -0700
Re: analysis of java application logs jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2011-05-23 11:45 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 09:11 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 19:16 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 15:02 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:03 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-26 14:43 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-05-23 18:32 -0300
Re: analysis of java application logs Ulrich Scholz <d7@thispla.net> - 2011-05-25 06:00 -0700
Re: analysis of java application logs Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-05-25 19:04 -0300
Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:25 +0000
Re: analysis of java application logs Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-05-24 12:26 +0100
Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-24 12:29 +0000
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 08:49 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-24 14:37 +0000
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 12:26 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 11:00 -0700
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 14:35 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-05-25 09:53 +0100
Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-24 19:12 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-23 06:17 -0700
Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 20:33 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-23 19:07 +0000
Re: analysis of java application logs CncShipper <anon@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-23 14:56 +0000
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 11:43 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2011-05-23 18:00 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 12:20 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 19:06 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 20:27 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 21:02 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 15:06 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 22:10 +0200
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 17:04 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-24 15:04 +0100
Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-24 14:50 +0000
Re: analysis of java application logs Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-26 14:58 -0400
Re: analysis of java application logs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-30 16:23 +1200
Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 01:08 -0400
csiph-web