Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7264

Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes

From	Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes
Date	2011-08-20 15:23 +0200
Message-ID	<9b9qreFj62U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(13 earlier) <slrnj4tgh1.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <9b85ssF8vsU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnj4trd9.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <9b9ckfF7uhU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnj4v7it.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>

Show all headers | View raw

On 08/20/2011 01:45 PM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
> Robert Klemme<shortcutter@googlemail.com>  wrote:
>> On 08/20/2011 01:11 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
>>> Of course I don't know the wider context, but to me it seemed as if
>>> a power-of-2 sized array would be such a natural choice, that you'd
>> That never occurred to me.  Limiting to powers of 2 does have some
>> advantages in some situation but it's certainly nothing I would consider
>> "natural" generally.
>
> Not generally, but in a context, where you've got an integer uniformly
> cycling through a power-of-2 sized range, and quickly(develop-time-wise)
> need a uniform cycle on a smaller range.

???  If the power of two is given then of course limiting sizes to power 
of two is "natural" - whatever that means in case of a tautology.

>>> May I ask, what other entity imposes the array length on you, and why
>>> choosing the next larger power of 2 will not do?
>> The value is user configurable and limiting to powers of 2 as valid
>> values would reduce the range of possible values unnecessarily
>> especially since the value is resource intensive - so the difference
>> between 6 and 8 could be significant.
>
> Since I can't believe the array's length itself is at stake here, I guess
> it's the objects that get stored in it, and only freed when overwritten.

Roughly.  Items are not overwritten, dunno where you got that from. 
Andreas, you are on the Holzweg. :-)

> If that's the case, I'd do this:
>    M being the configured value for the "size"
>    N being the smallest power-of-2 that is>= M
>
> create the array with a size of N, and before each write for a new object
> into position n, you write a null at position (n - M)&  (N-1).
> (modulo eventual off-by-one-errors)

Number M is given, it's the number of items to pick (in a thread safe 
manner also but that is irrelevant for the math).  If M is not a power 
of two then N > M and N mod M != 0 and no matter how you store your M 
items in an array of length N, iterating through the complete array of N 
elements will never produce uniform distribution of picks per item.  If 
you only use first M slots of the array and iterating them you simply 
waste N - M slots of the array and the power of two magic is completely 
worthless.

> But at this point it is possible that your compareAndSet approach
> is actually clearer/easier to understand :-)

Certainly.

Cheers

	robert

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes KevinSimonson <kvnsmnsn@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:53 -0700
  Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 09:30 -0700
  Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-08-16 21:37 +0100
  Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-16 14:54 -0700
    Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-16 20:47 -0400
  Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-16 20:38 -0400
    Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-16 17:52 -0700
      Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-16 21:56 -0400
        Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-16 20:20 -0700
          Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 20:45 -0700
            Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-17 06:31 -0300
              Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-17 13:28 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 07:17 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-17 19:02 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-17 16:09 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-17 23:48 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-17 17:34 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-17 18:07 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-18 08:22 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 18:37 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-18 11:50 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 20:49 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-18 14:48 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 22:50 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:49 -0400
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-17 21:50 -0400
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-19 14:13 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 20:05 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 00:20 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 23:11 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 11:21 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 11:45 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 15:23 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 16:15 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-17 21:34 -0400
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-18 07:58 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-18 06:29 -0300
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-08-18 10:47 +0100
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-18 11:35 -0700
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-18 18:30 -0300
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-19 14:57 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 20:10 +0000
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-19 19:12 -0300
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 00:26 +0200
                Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 22:59 +0000
          Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:34 -0400
            Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:46 -0400
              Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-17 19:51 -0700
    Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-08-17 08:29 -0400
      Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-17 16:04 +0200
      Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:51 -0400
  Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2011-08-17 11:24 +0300
    Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:55 -0400
      Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2011-08-18 10:59 +0300
  Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-17 22:09 -0700

csiph-web