Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7263
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| From | Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Subject | Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes |
| References | (12 earlier) <9b72b5FrgfU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnj4tgh1.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <9b85ssF8vsU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnj4trd9.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <9b9ckfF7uhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <slrnj4v7it.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-08-20 11:45 +0000 |
Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 08/20/2011 01:11 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: >> Of course I don't know the wider context, but to me it seemed as if >> a power-of-2 sized array would be such a natural choice, that you'd > That never occurred to me. Limiting to powers of 2 does have some > advantages in some situation but it's certainly nothing I would consider > "natural" generally. Not generally, but in a context, where you've got an integer uniformly cycling through a power-of-2 sized range, and quickly(develop-time-wise) need a uniform cycle on a smaller range. >> May I ask, what other entity imposes the array length on you, and why >> choosing the next larger power of 2 will not do? > The value is user configurable and limiting to powers of 2 as valid > values would reduce the range of possible values unnecessarily > especially since the value is resource intensive - so the difference > between 6 and 8 could be significant. Since I can't believe the array's length itself is at stake here, I guess it's the objects that get stored in it, and only freed when overwritten. If that's the case, I'd do this: M being the configured value for the "size" N being the smallest power-of-2 that is >= M create the array with a size of N, and before each write for a new object into position n, you write a null at position (n - M) & (N-1). (modulo eventual off-by-one-errors) But at this point it is possible that your compareAndSet approach is actually clearer/easier to understand :-)
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes KevinSimonson <kvnsmnsn@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:53 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 09:30 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-08-16 21:37 +0100
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-16 14:54 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-16 20:47 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-16 20:38 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-16 17:52 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-16 21:56 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-16 20:20 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 20:45 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-17 06:31 -0300
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-17 13:28 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 07:17 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-17 19:02 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-17 16:09 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-17 23:48 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-17 17:34 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-17 18:07 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-18 08:22 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 18:37 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-18 11:50 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 20:49 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-18 14:48 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 22:50 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:49 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-17 21:50 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-19 14:13 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 00:20 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 23:11 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 11:21 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 11:45 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 15:23 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 16:15 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-17 21:34 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-18 07:58 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-18 06:29 -0300
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-08-18 10:47 +0100
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-18 11:35 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-18 18:30 -0300
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-19 14:57 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 20:10 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-19 19:12 -0300
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-20 00:26 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-19 22:59 +0000
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:34 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:46 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-17 19:51 -0700
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-08-17 08:29 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-17 16:04 +0200
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:51 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2011-08-17 11:24 +0300
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-17 21:55 -0400
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2011-08-18 10:59 +0300
Re: Using Enumerated Types as Array Indexes Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-17 22:09 -0700
csiph-web