Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22019
| From | Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Editable issues |
| References | (9 earlier) <510a961b$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <c143vora79et.o087oi6ia9w4$.dlg@40tude.net> <510c6701$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <Hl_Os.8242$Sq4.5949@newsfe14.iad> <510d4b2b$0$295$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Message-ID | <8WdPs.121182$EO2.70994@newsfe04.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Public Usenet Newsgroup Access |
| Date | 2013-02-02 15:37 -0400 |
On 02/02/2013 01:21 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 2/1/2013 8:54 PM, Arved Sandstrom wrote: >> On 02/01/2013 09:08 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> On 1/31/2013 7:54 PM, Peter Duniho wrote: >> [ SNIP ] >>>> >>>> They just don't seem to have yet. And IMHO this is one reason why at >>>> least >>>> some people eschew using Java for desktop apps. It's certainly a >>>> significant factor in why I stopped bothering and went back to using >>>> .NET >>>> for my day-to-day ad hoc projects. >>>> >>>> I can't prove that I'm typical. But it's likely I'm not entirely unique >>>> either. :) >>> >>> I am sure there are other that do not like the Java GUI builders. >>> >>> But I am convinced that the main reason for the low usage >>> of Java for desktop apps is the look and feel not being >>> sufficient native. >> >> I think you're right about that latter. Desktop apps that I've written >> for various platforms in the past few years, professionally that is, >> have not been Java because they look like Java, not native. And I'll use >> Mono before I use Java, on other OS's. >> >> The pain of using Swing is there, it helps convince me not to use Java >> for desktop apps, but L&F is a bigger factor, sure. >> >> So for me the current painpoint with Java and GUIs is JSF, because I do >> that quite a lot. Like I said, I finally bit the bullet and automated >> the process for myself, so I can easily generated matching XHTML >> Facelets pages and managed beans, for example. > > But is it really a GUI builder or a wizard you want? > > GUI builder = tool you use initially and for maintenance of the GUI > > wizard = tool that generates a lot of boilerplate stuff that is then > refined and maintained by hand > > Arne > > Much closer to a wizard then to a builder. That's why using a simple Scala DSL for JSF works for me, it's not so much that I want to do layout that I want to avoid boilerplate. I generate coarse layout with divs and panelGrids and panelGroups and dataTables; I do the fine layout with CSS anyhow at a later stage. AHS
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Editable issues K <kalezwe@gmail.com> - 2013-01-28 21:19 -0800
Re: Editable issues Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-28 22:21 -0800
Re: Editable issues Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-28 23:17 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-29 06:27 -0400
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-29 22:02 -0500
Re: Editable issues Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-30 07:38 -0400
Re: Editable issues Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-30 08:32 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-30 19:34 -0400
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-30 20:04 -0500
Re: Editable issues Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-31 06:21 -0400
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-31 11:10 -0500
Re: Editable issues Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-01-31 04:15 -0800
Re: Editable issues Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-31 07:26 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-31 11:04 -0500
Re: Editable issues Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-31 16:54 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-01 04:59 -0400
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-01 20:08 -0500
Re: Editable issues Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-01 21:54 -0400
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-02 12:21 -0500
Re: Editable issues Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-02 15:37 -0400
Re: Editable issues Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-01 18:12 -0800
Re: Editable issues Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-01 20:33 -0800
Re: Editable issues Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-01 23:39 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-02 12:16 -0500
Re: Editable issues Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-02-02 09:59 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-02 21:05 -0500
Re: Editable issues Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-02-04 14:18 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:23 -0500
Re: Editable issues Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-02-04 14:11 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-04 18:17 -0500
Re: Editable issues Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-01 05:05 -0800
Re: Editable issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-30 20:03 -0500
Re: Editable issues Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-01-29 02:38 -0800
csiph-web