Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25697
| Path | csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!goblin2!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!exi-transit.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!exi-spool.telstra.net!exi-reader.telstra.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Date | Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:48:40 +1100 |
| From | Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> |
| Reply-To | not.esmond.pitt@not.bigpond.com |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) |
| References | <iijbfr$pb2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iijrj2$i0g$1@news.eternal-september.org> <iil6on$qvo$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4e7634$0$81475$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <iinje0$7j3$7@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f55ba$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <iiqbe9$q89$4@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d50b4dc$0$32795$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <iiqg8a$b4$1@news.albasani.net> <4d50da6e$0$32794$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <iiqrin$458$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| In-Reply-To | <iiqrin$458$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 9 |
| Message-ID | <4d521cac$0$32796$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 120.151.14.51 |
| X-Trace | 1297226924 exi-reader.telstra.net 32796 120.151.14.51:33168 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25697 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 8/02/2011 6:32 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > Nobody seriously used that stuff, because none of it was of any use. Windows 95 used it, ditto 98, and every version of NT. Ditto NetWare 4. > The only OS designed to try to make use of it, OS/2, flopped. For that reason?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-06 00:15 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 14:55 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 21:15 -0500
Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-09 15:48 +1100
Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 00:15 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 22:13 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-11 13:11 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Tim Slattery <Slattery_T@bls.gov> - 2011-02-08 09:00 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-08 14:13 +1100
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 20:31 +1300
Re: [OT] Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-08 16:53 +1100
Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 20:32 +1300
[OT] Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-07 23:19 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-02-07 18:58 +0100
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:59 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 15:59 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 22:09 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:00 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 22:07 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-06 21:22 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-05 09:26 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-06 14:30 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-06 20:42 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-02-07 21:03 -0800
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 14:51 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 12:54 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 21:08 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 15:10 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 19:57 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 14:51 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-05 09:24 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 09:28 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 15:20 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-02-06 10:55 -0800
Re: Java vs C++ Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-02-05 13:01 +0100
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-06 01:24 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-05 09:38 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-05 09:32 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Jef <e70838@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 04:34 -0800
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 21:12 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 14:53 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 09:30 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-02-05 15:02 +0100
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-05 10:49 -0500
csiph-web