Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26067

Re: Java vs C++

From	Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Java vs C++
Followup-To	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	2011-02-07 14:51 +1300
Organization	Geek Central
Message-ID	<iinj7a$7j3$4@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink)
References	<iijbfr$pb2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iincb2$3tp$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iinimq$q4v$1@news.eternal-september.org>

Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer

Show all headers | View raw

In message <iinimq$q4v$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Joshua Cranmer wrote:

> On 02/06/2011 06:54 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> Strange that Java never copied the C++ operator names "and”, “or” and
>> “not”.
> 
> Why should it have? They're just aliases for other objects.

They’re not objects, they’re operator names.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-06 20:42 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-02-07 21:03 -0800
  Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 14:51 +1300
  Re: Java vs C++ Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2011-02-07 20:43 -0800

csiph-web