Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26154
| Date | 2011-02-06 20:38 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java vs C++ |
| References | <iijbfr$pb2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <2011020510425674637-angrybaldguy@gmailcom> <iil0or$niu$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4e25e8@news.x-privat.org> <iinedc$3tp$9@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| Message-ID | <4d4f4d2c$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 06-02-2011 19:29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message<4d4e25e8@news.x-privat.org>, Ken Wesson wrote: >> Java is very widely used for network and business applications, and web >> apps, these days ... > > I was trying to make sense of where you were coming from with your > predictions, and then I realized—you’re primarily talking about corporate > development. Because that’s just about the only place languages like Java > and C#/Dotnet get much use. Very few mass-market or open-source apps are > written in those languages, for example. Which is just plain wrong. Java and C# are both very popular for open source projects. Sometimes statistics are done for SF projects. The last I can find for December 2007 has Java as #1 and C# as #7 and VB.NET as #14. So Java and .NET are very much used for open source. Desktop market is still dominated by native apps. It may change someday if MS starts to rewrite MFC stuff in .NET. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Java vs C++ Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-02-05 10:42 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 09:22 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:57 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:06 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:56 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:06 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 22:17 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-08 19:46 -0400
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 12:23 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-07 07:37 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:08 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 19:06 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Helium Balloon <hb.3459s._jsf3k@goo.abvg> - 2011-02-06 19:55 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 13:29 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:47 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:38 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:34 -0400
csiph-web