Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25558
| From | Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Message-ID | <2011020510425674637-angrybaldguy@gmailcom> (permalink) |
| References | <iijbfr$pb2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| Subject | Re: Java vs C++ |
| Date | 2011-02-05 10:42 -0500 |
On 2011-02-05 06:15:07 -0500, Lawrence D'Oliveiro said: > This PDF copy of “The Java Language Specification”, 3rd Edition, that I’m > currently reading, has 684 pages. By comparison, the paper copy of “The C++ > Standard” on my bookshelf has 782 numbered pages. As you can see, Java is no > longer that far off C++ in complexity. This is an extremely dubious measure of complexity. The Common Lisp specification is over a thousand pages long in some editions*, but Lisp is generally considered a much simpler language than either C++ or Java. You've posted extensively about things you see in Java that you don't like, and there's a strong "C++ is better" undercurrent to your posts. While I disagree with the undercurrent, I will defend to the death your right to program in C++ instead. Just, please, go away. -o * <http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/cltl2.html>, which predates the ANSI spec.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Java vs C++ Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-02-05 10:42 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 09:22 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:57 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:56 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:06 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 22:17 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 12:23 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-07 07:37 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:08 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Helium Balloon <hb.3459s._jsf3k@goo.abvg> - 2011-02-06 19:55 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 13:29 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:34 -0400
csiph-web