Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25598
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java vs C++ |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | 2011-02-08 09:22 +1300 |
| Organization | Geek Central |
| Message-ID | <iipka1$d4o$7@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <4d4e25e8@news.x-privat.org> <iinah1$2up$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f45fc$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <iio24q$g2f$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iiop28$8jj$1@news.eternal-september.org> |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer
In message <iiop28$8jj$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Joshua Cranmer wrote: > On 02/07/2011 01:06 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> In message<4d4f45fc$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> And the C spec leaves a lot of things to implementations. >> >> Not too much that you can’t write portable code in it. > > Writing portable code in C pretty much requires you to do hefty > compatibility layers. Not really. Sticking to standard POSIX types like size_t, time_t etc gets you a lot of the way there. > Many projects use typedefs to get proper-sized int variables (you can't > use stdint.h, as MSVC doesn't implement it, as of MSVC 9.0). How sad for MSVC...
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Java vs C++ Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-02-05 10:42 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 09:22 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:57 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:06 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:56 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:06 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 22:17 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 12:23 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-07 07:37 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:08 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Helium Balloon <hb.3459s._jsf3k@goo.abvg> - 2011-02-06 19:55 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 13:29 +1300
Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:47 -0500
Re: Java vs C++ Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:34 -0400
csiph-web