Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26078
| Date | 2011-02-06 20:47 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java vs C++ |
| References | (1 earlier) <2011020510425674637-angrybaldguy@gmailcom> <iil0or$niu$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4e25e8@news.x-privat.org> <iinedc$3tp$9@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f4d2c$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Message-ID | <4d4f4f2b$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 06-02-2011 20:38, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 06-02-2011 19:29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> In message<4d4e25e8@news.x-privat.org>, Ken Wesson wrote: >>> Java is very widely used for network and business applications, and web >>> apps, these days ... >> >> I was trying to make sense of where you were coming from with your >> predictions, and then I realized—you’re primarily talking about corporate >> development. Because that’s just about the only place languages like Java >> and C#/Dotnet get much use. Very few mass-market or open-source apps are >> written in those languages, for example. > > Which is just plain wrong. > > Java and C# are both very popular for open source projects. > > Sometimes statistics are done for SF projects. > > The last I can find for December 2007 has Java as #1 and > C# as #7 and VB.NET as #14. > > So Java and .NET are very much used for open source. > > Desktop market is still dominated by native apps. It may > change someday if MS starts to rewrite MFC stuff in .NET. And in case somebody wants to check the list: http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ProgrammingLanguagePopularity Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 13:29 +1300 Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:47 -0500 Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:38 -0500
csiph-web