Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #1421
| From | Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do |
| Date | 2011-12-07 10:27 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jbo46f$a6e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <u68hd7pof919ntfla1lgobj7lve3k615ah@4ax.com> <22410014.387.1322839240485.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfx15> <kmmkd7103jcvqpsb6vtb2a3jfhubqu50mi@4ax.com> <30773772.321.1322940508644.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prnu24> <afvtd75kpoupomid75755v2033pod9d7a5@4ax.com> |
On 12/6/2011 11:47 PM, Roedy Green wrote: > You could least write a program for DOS and have it run on any DOS or > Windows machine. Because of browsers you can't even do wora anymore > even within Windows. From a practical point of view, JavaScript and > browsers mean programmers spend more time dealing with tweaking to > make code work everywhere than they did before. Command line stuff is > great. It is browsers, JavaScript and forms that drive you nuts. I wasn't around for DOS, but certainly any era of Windows that I lived through never had a "WORA" effect, even if you limit it to just Windows machines (possibly even to just a /version/ of Windows). On top of that, in my lifetime, there have only been 2 years where I was not in contact with a non-Windows-based computers, so even limiting it to Windows isn't limiting. As someone who has done some limited browser + JS coding, it has not been my experience that I spend any time tweaking to make code work everywhere. I don't mean it to imply that this isn't the case, but I will point that there are toolkits which paper over most of the inconsistencies for you. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-29 15:28 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-11-29 15:41 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-29 16:36 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-11-30 16:51 +0000
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-11-30 11:30 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-01 01:59 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-01 06:47 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-02 01:58 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 07:20 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-03 09:23 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-03 11:28 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-06 21:47 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 07:08 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-12-07 10:27 -0600
csiph-web