Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #1408
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do |
| Date | 2011-11-29 16:36 -0800 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <b4uad7tkpp8lkjk07ko7512ae3es8slbsp@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <f7qad7h1a48tcaunk3u44jn8783hnutt2b@4ax.com> <Z4eBq.279$LO2.151@newsfe13.iad> |
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:41:44 -0800, Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >Have you tried spoofing a different User Agent value? I spoof Firefox, yet Firefox itself can read these. I have run into ones that want IE only though. One trick I ran into was you could not just go to the page. You had to go to the home page and navigate your way there picking up cookies as you went. With 15 minutes of Wireshark, I am pretty sure you can figure out what any one of them is doing to foil Java. It is just so irritating that people screw up what was intended as such a simple scheme. I have a puzzle in this category I have not been able to crack. My own website allows padsites to probe my site with HEAD requests to find out which pads or zips have changed. Some padsites can do it fine, where others cannot. My ISP says we are doing nothing strange. "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence." ~ Napoleon Bonaparte. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com For me, the appeal of computer progamming is that even though I am quite a klutz, I can still produce something, in a sense perfect, because the computer gives me as many chances as I please to get it right.
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-29 15:28 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-11-29 15:41 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-29 16:36 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-11-30 16:51 +0000
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-11-30 11:30 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-01 01:59 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-01 06:47 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-02 01:58 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 07:20 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-03 09:23 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-03 11:28 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-06 21:47 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 07:08 -0800
Re: Failure of Java HTTP, some puzzles for those with not enough to do Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-12-07 10:27 -0600
csiph-web